Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Christoph Feck
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 22:37:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Actually i've changed my mind, too much people has already upped > the version numbers and done preparations, so i've just reverted > the commits from Andras and will tag 4.12.0 with that. > > If Andras appears and says his commits

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:45:42, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:06:20, Thomas Lübking va > > escriure: > > On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I am hoping that Andras would let us just rev

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 21:06:20, Thomas Lübking va escriure: > On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his changes > > since reading the > > commit logs seems like they are only optimizations th

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 20:41:28 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: I am hoping that Andras would let us just revert his changes since reading the commit logs seems like they are only optimizations that ended up wrong (i.e. i hope he wasn't really doing any bugfix). Depends on how fast An

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 20:20:54, Martin Graesslin va escriure: > On Wednesday 11 December 2013 19:59:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in > > KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I > > w

Re: Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 19:59:51 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in > KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I > won't fight that now) > > More info at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328528 > > It s

Re: Failing testcase in kpasswdservertest [kde-runtime]

2013-12-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 11 de desembre de 2013, a les 13:59:57, Dawit A va escriure: > Great. I will commit the patch once I get a chance then. Unless of course > either you or Albert has already done so. I just did it. Cheers, Albert > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Wed,

Re: Failing testcase in kpasswdservertest [kde-runtime]

2013-12-11 Thread Dawit A
Great. I will commit the patch once I get a chance then. Unless of course either you or Albert has already done so. On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dawit A wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> >>> El D

Regression of KItemWidgetDelegate in 4.12

2013-12-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi guys, seems that 4.12 is hit by a pretty bad regression in KItemWidgetDelegate (patches that don't seem to have been reviewed, but I won't fight that now) More info at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328528 It seems we're not going to have a fix for today, that is when we are supposed

WARNING: kdepimlibs has been force pushed

2013-12-11 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, Just a little notice that kdepimlibs has been force pushed to reverse a change which had broken the KDE/4.12 release. Due to the nature of the change, a force push was the only method usable to correct it. To adjust your local clones, please perform the following. git remote update git c

Re: Failing testcase in kpasswdservertest [kde-runtime]

2013-12-11 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dawit A wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> El Dimarts, 10 de desembre de 2013, a les 08:57:47, Dawit A va escriure: >> > Sorry for the late response. I did not see this email for some reason. >> None >> > of the test cases in