Milian Wolff writes:
> There is no alternative, see above. Rather have bigger binaries than not being
> able to compile at all.
Finally fixed: http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/daa54a25
> Also, have you reported the errors that clang outputs to the developers? If
> it's correct analysis, it should
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111851/
---
(Updated Nov. 17, 2013, 9:53 p.m.)
Review request for Documentation, KDE R
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113915/
---
(Updated Nov. 17, 2013, 8:33 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113915/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Repository: kde-runtime
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111851/#review43855
---
Please review
- Burkhard Lück
On Sept. 3, 2013, 12:38 p.m.,
> On May 28, 2013, 11:06 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Could you please get some feedback from packagers. I'm not sure whether
> > they like words like "unmaintained" and "upgrade". The fact that we as
> > upstream don't accept bugs doesn't mean it's unmaintained by the distro and
> > it's n
