Rex Dieter wrote:
> Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>
>> The current
>> AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
>> problems from any Qt app
>
> this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
>
> Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm having trouble finding any)
My googling fa
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> The current
> AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
> problems from any Qt app
this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm having trouble finding any)
It appears apper needs this to enable appstream
2013/11/3 Richard Hughes :
> On 3 November 2013 17:15, Thomas Lübking wrote:
>> * does it presently qualify as "standard" at all? (not as long as it states
>> particular tools - like gnome i18n, as claimed by David)
>
> Well, it's my standard, and I'm happy to do the extra work if any
> other desk
On 3 November 2013 17:15, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> I think everyone who read this thread was immediately aware that the "high
> quality applications" argument is "flawed" (i've actually another term in
> mind)
Sure, that might be true, but that's not what I was originally trying
to help with. AppD
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113355/
---
(Updated Nov. 3, 2013, 7 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been discard
> On Oct. 31, 2013, 2:41 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > I see now that I have tried to put too much stuff into a single patch -
> > it's too hard to digest and to understand, and the number of possibilities
> > to modify different aspects of UDSEntry in a different way is just too
> > larg
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113591/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Repository: kdelibs
Descript
On Sonntag, 3. November 2013 16:28:56 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 13:24:40, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I am all for listing "high quality applications", it's just
that this just
doesn't help.
Su
Attached is an appdata xml file for every kde project.
http://static.davidedmundson.co.uk/kde_appdata.zip (note, I have not
tested these in anything)
and the script to generate it
http://static.davidedmundson.co.uk/appdata_generator.txt
(requires an "svn checkout
svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 13:24:40, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
> On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I am all for listing "high quality applications", it's just that this just
> > doesn't help.
>
> Sure it does. We're not going to get AppData files for sodipod
Spec comments:
- The spec says to link to a .desktop file for the application.
This is typically installed with the application (or it is in KDE apps
anyway), I'm confused as to how this is intended to work.
- I would include project icon and project license in the file format.
Maybe this is link
On Sunday 03 November 2013 15:09:13 David Edmundson wrote:
> That means we get Gnome app centre support, and if Muon want to use
> that spec - that'd be great too.
As far as I know Muon-packagekit is already using it (ot it s planned at
least).
On 3 November 2013 14:04, Felix Rohrbach wrote:
> "Nice application you have there, would be a shame if something would...
> happen to it."
Not at all. If something as important as Krita didn't ship an AppData
file in Fedora 22, we'd just write one ourselves and put it in the
Fedora srpm file. I'
On Sunday 03 November 2013 13:50:05 Richard Hughes wrote:
> I don't think that's true at all. Krita and Inkscape are two of the
> killer apps I'd love to feature more prominently in GNOME Software.
Yes, and of course both applications would do anything it takes to get listed
in the package manage
The whole discussion of whether gnome excludes apps without app-data
will improve the quality of those listed is sort of a moot topic.
We could do with this having this sort of metadata available for all KDE apps;
and in fact we already maintain this sort of data to build the pages
at http://kde.
Richard, do you realize how you sound like?
"Nice application you have there, would be a shame if something would...
happen to it."
Imho it's a matter of respect to discuss a standard beforehand with a
community. And this threat to exclude apps, well...
Also, using this as a sign of quality is n
On Saturday, November 02, 2013 08:35:13 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 12:59:00, Allen Winter va escriure:
> > On Saturday, November 02, 2013 12:15:15 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Hi, yesterday i was talking with someone about the desktop file class we
On 3 November 2013 13:30, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Assuming KDE did that, then we would end up with a situation where you can't
> easily install Krita in distributions that ship GNOME, and you can't easily
> install Inkscape in distributions that ship KDE.
I don't think that's true at all. Krita and
On Sunday 03 November 2013 12:22:52 Richard Hughes wrote:
> This is what we've decided to do in GNOME, KDE is free to decide any policy
> it wants. We've decided that 500 high quality applications are better than
> 3000 broken ones.
Assuming KDE did that, then we would end up with a situation wher
On 3 November 2013 12:32, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> I am all for listing "high quality applications", it's just that this just
> doesn't help.
Sure it does. We're not going to get AppData files for sodipodi,
cinepaint or arora any time soon. I don't think _having_ an AppData
file makes an applic
El Diumenge, 3 de novembre de 2013, a les 12:22:52, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
> On 3 Nov 2013 11:59, "Albert Astals Cid" wrote:
> > I've never created a standard so I can't comment on how to do it
>
> properly, but
>
> > writing it and then "threatening" to exclude from package managers those
On 3 Nov 2013 11:59, "Albert Astals Cid" wrote:
> I've never created a standard so I can't comment on how to do it
properly, but
> writing it and then "threatening" to exclude from package managers those
that
> don't adopt it doesn't seem to be a way to start a discussion to me
This is what we've
El Dissabte, 2 de novembre de 2013, a les 19:48:01, Richard Hughes va
escriure:
> On 2 November 2013 19:33, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > What's the point in having an installer that hides more than half of the
> > apps in the world that don't ship a file that is not a standard and
> > doesn't see
23 matches
Mail list logo
