> On Oct. 25, 2013, 2:55 a.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> > I have no objection to this patch. However, I want to make sure you have
> > tested the other modes before I give it a thumbs up. Did you try the manual
> > proxy setup with your patch? Also adding some exceptions to make sure it
> > ho
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113364/#review42328
---
I have no objection to this patch. However, I want to make sure
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113355/#review42327
---
Just some minor nitpicking that i can see.
kio/kio/udsentry.c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113355/
---
(Updated Oct. 24, 2013, 10:34 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113413/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime, kde-workspace and Andriy Rysin.
Repository
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 3:35 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Actually, this is something that I wanted to do ever since I saw it on a
> > different screen to the one I had when I made it.
> >
> > If you want to try it with a radial gradient, mind that around the logo,
> > the background needs to be pi
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 4:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 6:17 p.m., Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KSplashX?
> >
> > Let's not forget that the reason KPlash was rewritten to only depend on
> > X + libjpeg + libpng was so that the startup time would be limited by
> > the time
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113415/#review42299
---
What's the cold startup time like for KSplashQML compared to KS
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 3:35 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Actually, this is something that I wanted to do ever since I saw it on a
> > different screen to the one I had when I made it.
> >
> > If you want to try it with a radial gradient, mind that around the logo,
> > the background needs to be pi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113147/
---
(Updated Oct. 24, 2013, 3:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113147/#review42293
---
This review has been submitted with commit
bf9b5b66771e78a0e12
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113419/#review42292
---
Actually, this is something that I wanted to do ever since I sa
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 3:08 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > I have to add some explanation to that.
> >
> > I'm all OK with plain and simplistic, but not TOO plain and simplistic
> > (aka, the Windows 8 and apple route). We don't live in a monochrome age
> > anymore so i think the theme
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113419/
---
(Updated Oct. 24, 2013, 3:15 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and Pl
> On Oct. 24, 2013, 3:08 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > I have to add some explanation to that.
> >
> > I'm all OK with plain and simplistic, but not TOO plain and simplistic
> > (aka, the Windows 8 and apple route). We don't live in a monochrome age
> > anymore so i think the theme
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113419/#review42286
---
-1
I have to add some explanation to that.
I'm all OK with pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113419/#review42284
---
IMHO ship it! but I will wait for others to give you "Ship It!"
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113419/
---
Review request for kde-workspace and Plasma.
Repository: kde-workspace
D
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113415/
---
(Updated Oct. 24, 2013, 2:19 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113415/#review42283
---
This review has been submitted with commit
90e2c0b65cce3f899d4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113415/#review42281
---
Ship it!
Looks ok. It will need testing with the startkde/star
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113415/
---
Review request for kde-workspace and KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kde-works
Hi,
could someone with proper credentials delete the kde-workspace remote
branch called master-xcb, I just created it *by mistake* while pushing
some changes to master ?
Thanks in advance,
Hugo
30 matches
Mail list logo