Hello,
On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-*
> prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE
> seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM).
> [1]
It do
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113205/#review41670
---
Why do it just for result and not finished, suspended, resumed?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113194/#review41669
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me, it's what you should be doing accor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105304/#review41662
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On Oct. 13, 2013, 6:07 p.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108312/
---
(Updated Oct. 13, 2013, 6:20 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and KDE Usab
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105304/
---
(Updated Oct. 13, 2013, 6:07 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Cha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113216/#review41651
---
Imo it's wrong to return const& in the first place. You can bin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113185/
---
(Updated Oct. 13, 2013, 4:18 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113185/#review41647
---
This review has been submitted with commit
fa0a5cfc5755b282b38
