Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Weng Xuetian wrote: > Would it be easier to make phonon-gstreamer to use QtGstreamer and hence > also make someone to maintain QtGstreamer? No. Maintaining two things is more work than maintaining one ;) On top of that there are no real synergies between the two

Re: Fwd: looking for phonon gstreamer maintainer

Another question, gstreamer is not parallel linkable, and ktp-call-ui is currently using QtGstreamer (which also seems unmaintained for quite some time) and it's using gstreamer 0.10. So if phonon-gstreamer is ported to gstreamer then QtGstreamer also must be ported to 1.0 (Though phonon-gstreamer

Re: Review Request 112848: Adding unit tests for kbuttongroup and fixing identation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112848/#review41014 --- kdeui/tests/kbuttongrouptest.cpp