On Thursday 26 September 2013 02:23:31 Aleix Pol wrote:
> The question would be then, why is it that there's some API that's only
> needed for internal usage? If it's needed internally, it will be most
> likely needed externally, at some point. The fact that you decide to label
> it as private mak
On 2013-09-25, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 17:51:41 Mark wrote:
>> Doesn't your naming proposal completely ruin the org.kde.* stuff? Up until
>> now i could fairly safely assume that all QML KDE imports where hidden
>> under org.kde.* but that isn't the case anymore
25.09.2013 15:25 пользователь "Aaron J. Seigo" написал:
>
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:35:25 Harald Sitter wrote:
> > since everyone who ever was/is/wanted to be Phonon GStreamer
> > maintainer is either busy or has no interest in it, the backend has as
> > of right now no actual maintena
