Hello all,
As you might know, the Qt DevDays 2013 Call for Papers has been out for a
little while now. It looks like there's not many proposals sent by KDE
people... I think it would be nice if KDE was well represented there, and that
includes having as many good talks as possible.
You're like
I'm experimenting with intel compiler on windows, but those four features
are documented as supported[1] from version 14.0 on (never tested those
features, though), so it looks like it won't be a problem here either.
[1]
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c0x-features-supported-by-intel-c-co
> On July 20, 2013, 8:20 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Thanks for the unittest; I don't see the added documentation though?
*sigh* I forgot to commit my changes before I generated the diff this time.
This was the original patch I was wanted to post. Not the one I should have
uploaded this time
On Saturday 20 July 2013 13:28:47 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> I'd also be inclined to think of kde-runtime as part of kdelibs,
> rather than the workspace
Yes, that is very true. Especially since the plan for most of kde-runtime is
to fold it into the relevant frameworks, IIRC.
--
David Faure, fa...@
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/#review36198
---
Thanks for the unittest; I don't see the added documentation th
Hello everyone,
This is the minutes of the Week 30 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held on
#kde-devel at 4pm Paris time.
Were present: ben2367, dfaure, miroslav, sandsmark, scarpino, sebas, steveire,
wojtask9 and myself.
Announcements:
* Everyone update your qt5.git, we'll soon start to use
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 17:48:25 Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/7/23 David Faure :
> >> tsdgeos:
> >> can someone please kick kdelibs people to fix the tests
> >
> > Hmm?
> > http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_stable/ is very green.
>
> Altough this gets a bit offtopic... Here is the exempt from my
Lost in translation, i said kdepim instead of kdelibs.
Cheers,
Albert
De: David Faure
Para: kde-core-devel@kde.org; Albert Astals Cid
Enviado: Martes 23 de julio de 2013 14:22
Asunto: Re: release schedule BoF
> tsdgeos:
> can someone please kick kdeli
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111462/
---
(Updated July 23, 2013, 12:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111462/#review36374
---
This review has been submitted with commit
f72a31eddcb434e30f4
> tsdgeos:
> can someone please kick kdelibs people to fix the tests
Hmm?
http://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs_stable/ is very green.
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
On Saturday 20 July 2013 23:04:10 Michael Pyne wrote:
> Well there's a 3rd method as well, which is to add a separate metadata file
> to the kde-build-metadata repository which maps each git repository to its
> appropriate branch for each of the 3 categories.
Sounds good to me.
> This is a labor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111648/#review36366
---
this is the look of the taskbar until 4.9, and it was changed b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111648/
---
(Updated July 23, 2013, 11:36 a.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and E
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/
---
(Updated July 23, 2013, 11:32 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/#review36365
---
This review has been submitted with commit
05fd1dce17c10ec6505
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111462/#review36335
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Faure
On July 23, 2013, 3:47 a.m.
17 matches
Mail list logo
