Am 7/21/2013 13:52, schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>
> This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
> override to empty.
Not so. 'override' is a legal identifier, not a pure keyword.
> On July 21, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past the dependency
> > freeze
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> CMakeLists.txt already requires Qt 4.8.0.
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But isn't the content of CMakeLists.tx
> On July 21, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past the dependency
> > freeze
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> CMakeLists.txt already requires Qt 4.8.0.
But isn't the content of CMakeLists.txt for kdelibs and the content in th
On domingo, 21 de julho de 2013 14.45.52, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> I totally agree with that. As I said: detection of this is trivial at CMake
> time, maybe I get my C++ feature detection package ready even to be
> included in 2.8.12, and if not the stuff can easily be extracted. And
> afterwards y
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/#review36267
---
This review has been submitted with commit
e4b786f6df87aba2269
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/
---
(Updated July 21, 2013, 6:32 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
> On July 21, 2013, 4:47 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past the dependency
> > freeze
CMakeLists.txt already requires Qt 4.8.0.
- Christoph
---
This is an automatically gener
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/#review36261
---
Is that qt change really needed? Otherwise we are a bit past th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/
---
Review request for Build System, kdelibs and Alexander Neundorf.
Descripti
On Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:10:11 David Faure wrote:
> On Saturday 20 July 2013 13:28:47 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > I'd also be inclined to think of kde-runtime as part of kdelibs,
> > rather than the workspace
>
> Yes, that is very true. Especially since the plan for most of kde-runtime
> is to f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111585/#review36244
---
Ship it!
Ah, now I understand. Before hitting Undo, the user c
Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 14:11:07 schrieb Volker Krause:
> On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Volker Krause wrote:
> > > - GCC >= 4.5
> > >
> > > - override
> >
> > Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>
> you are ri
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111626/
---
Review request for Amarok, kdelibs and Solid.
Description
---
https:/
On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Volker Krause wrote:
> > - GCC >= 4.5
> >
> > - override
>
> Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
>
> This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
> override
On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Volker Krause wrote:
> > - GCC >= 4.5
> >
> > - override
>
> Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
you are right, it's also what all other sources referenced in
http://article.gmane.org/gma
> This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
> override to empty.
Yes, similarly can be done for the nullptr.
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
Volker Krause wrote:
> - GCC >= 4.5
> - override
Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7:
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html
This is trivially to work around by a CMake time check and then just define
override to empty.
Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 11:15:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David
Hi,
during one of the KF5 BoFs at Akademy we discussed which compilers we want to
support for KF5 (for KDE PIM: s/KF5/Akonadi >=1.11/). The conclusion was to do
what Qt does (http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtdoc/platform-details.html)
but ignore the older optional platforms (some of which are
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 11:15:29 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote: ...
git symbolic-ref refs/heads/NEXT refs/heads/master
or for w
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote:
>>>
>>> After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron over a video
>>> chat, we came up with the following setu
On Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013 05:04:10 CEST, Michael Pyne wrote:
On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 David Faure wrote:
After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco plus Aaron over a video
chat, we came up with the following setup for the workspace repos (*) :
Adding a similar generic selection for q
22 matches
Mail list logo
