On Sat, July 13, 2013 23:36:24 David Faure wrote:
> No changes to anyone's workflow, including translators, testers, powerusers,
> distros, kde-wide bugfixers, etc. The only ones who have to switch to
> another branch is the people switching to a qt5/frameworks based
> development, and these people
On Thursday 11 July 2013 11:55:54 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I'd be in favor of moving master to Qt5/Frameworks5 soonish:
>
> - I don't want to have to keep track of merging between 3 branches, 2 is
> really enough
> - kde-workspace developers have decided to move onto Frameworks5 after 4.11
> i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111335/
---
(Updated July 13, 2013, 1:30 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111335/#review35917
---
This review has been submitted with commit
47fd9e7f1cbd5865328
How would the release schedule (
http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule) be in a 3 or 4
mounths release? 1 month for new features, 2 or 3 for bugfixing, translating,
language bindings? Or like linux kernel, allways develop new features in other
branches, and 1 month to me
On Friday, July 12, 2013 10:53:32 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> Heya folk!
>
> One of our resident usability experts, Björn Balazs, will team up with
yours
> truly to host a Usability Workshop on Monday at Akademy, provided we can
> find people interested in them.
We will host a usability workshop o
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> 1. packagers seem to feel that if upstream doesn’t do the actual commit to
> the upstream repository, then upstream is not maintaining their software
To be honest, that's not always true. At least the major distributions and a
few of the minors have packagers that hold KD
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111335/#review35913
---
Ship it!
Perfect, thanks :-)
- David Faure
On July 13, 2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111335/
---
(Updated July 13, 2013, 7:22 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
-
> On July 13, 2013, 6:32 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Almost there, thanks.
> >
> > I'm surprised by the dispatch (to call one of the many uidelegate methods),
> > followed by an un-dispatch (what's the term?), i.e. these many methods all
> > end up calling the same method anyway I can see
10 matches
Mail list logo
