---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111054/
---
Review request for Documentation, kdelibs and Luigi Toscano.
Description
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111054/
---
(Updated June 17, 2013, 2:12 a.m.)
Review request for Documentation, kdeli
> On May 18, 2013, 8:44 a.m., Commit Hook wrote:
> > This review has been submitted with commit
> > df845b06bc440fff5a43a9cdc149e8c88c29bc67 by Martin Koller to branch master.
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Just noticed this has been committed to kolourpaint instead of kdelibs.
> Did I miss a
So my path in a Plasma session is
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games
This makes the QT_SELECT thing from qtchooser not work
since if i do
QT_SELECT=qt5 moc
i still get the /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt4/bin moc
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110649/#review34447
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
Maksim Orlovich suggested that we
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111000/
---
(Updated June 16, 2013, 6:31 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111000/#review34445
---
This review has been submitted with commit
ef72f8530e579002eb3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/#review34443
---
Some comments on code.
But I agree that this is too late for 4.
> On June 15, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Is this some kind of joke?
> >
> > Honestly upstreaming patches is good, but when they make sense, and adding
> > billions of "If #SUSE" to our code does not make any sense. Please discard
> > this review, break stuff in separate patc
> On June 16, 2013, 4:59 p.m., Sven Brauch wrote:
> > While speedup is certainly always great, this sounds dangerous to me:
> >
> > > I am getting an inconsistency. Using the unpatched fast mime detection on
> > > a file like: "test.tar.gz" gets detected as
> > > "application-x-compressed-tar"
> On June 16, 2013, 4:59 p.m., Sven Brauch wrote:
> > While speedup is certainly always great, this sounds dangerous to me:
> >
> > > I am getting an inconsistency. Using the unpatched fast mime detection on
> > > a file like: "test.tar.gz" gets detected as
> > > "application-x-compressed-tar"
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/#review34437
---
While speedup is certainly always great, this sounds dangerous
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111050/
---
Review request for kdelibs, David Faure and Frank Reininghaus.
Description
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110330/#review34432
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Àlex Fiestas
On May 8, 2013, 11:12 p.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108570/
---
(Updated June 16, 2013, 12:04 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111048/
---
(Updated June 16, 2013, 1:46 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Da
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111048/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure.
Description
---
The
On Sunday 16 June 2013 01:13:13 Christoph Feck wrote:
>
> > On May 18, 2013, 12:44 p.m., Commit Hook wrote:
> > > This review has been submitted with commit
> > > df845b06bc440fff5a43a9cdc149e8c88c29bc67 by Martin Koller to branch
> > > master.
> >
> > Christoph Feck wrote:
> > Just noticed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110649/
---
(Updated June 16, 2013, 11:58 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Chan
> On June 15, 2013, 7:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Is this some kind of joke?
> >
> > Honestly upstreaming patches is good, but when they make sense, and adding
> > billions of "If #SUSE" to our code does not make any sense. Please discard
> > this review, break stuff in separate patc
25 matches
Mail list logo
