Re: Review Request 110328: Add config option to silently create initial password-less wallet

2013-05-25 Thread Rex Dieter
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go. > > > > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a > > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use > > this patch but then they shoul

Re: Review Request 110328: Add config option to silently create initial password-less wallet

2013-05-25 Thread Àlex Fiestas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110328/#review33135 --- I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go. What we have to pr

Re: Review Request 103555: Fix for stale permissions information in properties dialog

2013-05-25 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103555/ --- (Updated May 25, 2013, 5:23 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mark

Re: Review Request 103555: Fix for stale permissions information in properties dialog

2013-05-25 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103555/#review33134 --- This review has been submitted with commit 9c1e5d56cdfb844f49a

Dependency Freeze for 4.11 in 4 days

2013-05-25 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Dependency freeze for 4.11 releases is in 4 days (May 29th), please be sure you update all the needed dependencies before that date. Notorious dependencies we might want to discuss: * kde-runtime depends on kdelibs 4.10.0 (4.9.95) * kde-baseapps depends on kdelibs 4.10.2 * kde-workspace depend

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am Samstag 25 Mai 2013, 10:19:37 schrieb Jekyll Wu: > Well, DrKonqi uses Product.get API to fetch product information from > bugs.kde.org, including all available versions (either active or disabled). > But that is not the point of those "escaped" reports which shouldn't be > accepted. Even if DrK

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Jekyll Wu
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'

Re: Moving Plasma Media Center to extragear

2013-05-25 Thread Sinny Kumari
Thanks to all of you for valuable feedback. With your positive response, I have made request to sysadmin now https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317649 . On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:16 AM, David Edmundson wrote: > From my side (as someone who reviewed this) I'm happy for this to go > to extragea

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Jekyll Wu
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Jekyll Wu
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On May 24, 2013, 11:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don

Re: Review Request 110633: Don't report crashes if version is disabled in Bugzilla

2013-05-25 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On May 24, 2013, 9:44 p.m., Jekyll Wu wrote: > > Bugzilla itself (since 4.2.5) already rejects any attempt against disabled > > versions. So even without this patch, DrKonqi users won't be able to create > > crash report against disabled versions in the end. From developers POV, you > > don'