Re: Finalized proposal for i18n in KF5, second iteration

2013-04-02 Thread Andreas Hartmetz
On Tuesday 02 April 2013 15:46:52 Chusslove Illich wrote: > After considering comments from the previous iteration: > > > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2012-December/001358.htm > l > > here is the updated version: > > http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-02/html/prg_guid

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Dario Freddi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109792/#review30295 --- Just to notify you I'm not dead, I've just had an unexpected tr

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On April 2, 2013, 2:58 p.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote: > > powerdevil/daemon/actions/bundled/dimdisplay.cpp, lines 53-62 > > > > > > Resolving bug #304696 is good, in my eyes. I'd like affirmation from > > Dario tho

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109814: bump workspace to require Qt 4.8.0

2013-04-02 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On April 1, 2013, 10:18 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Qt 4.8 seems like it was released 1.5 years ago, if we need it for a > > feature I don't see why we should not increase the requirement > > Michael Pyne wrote: > I agree. Even RHEL 6.2 seems to be able to build Qt 4.8, so it doesn

Re: Review Request 109404: Give more precedence to qmake executable names that specify the version

2013-04-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 2 de abril de 2013 06.28.49, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Yes, this is not needed anymore because qmake always refers to Qt5 in Arch. > The qt4 package doesn't ship qmake anymore and /usr/lib/qt4/bin isn't in > $PATH. The /usr/bin/*-qt4 symlinks point to files in /usr/lib/qt4/bin. And

Finalized proposal for i18n in KF5, second iteration

2013-04-02 Thread Chusslove Illich
After considering comments from the previous iteration: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2012-December/001358.html here is the updated version: http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-02/html/prg_guide.html http://nedohodnik.net/misc/ki18n-kf5-02/klocalizedstring.h http://

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Àlex Fiestas
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109792/ --- (Updated April 2, 2013, 1:52 p.m.) Review request for kde-workspace, Solid

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Àlex Fiestas
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109611: Add option to show "Recently Installed" apps in kickoff plasmoid

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109611/#review30265 --- Please add a screenshot for every change that affects the UI.

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Danny Baumann
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109404: Give more precedence to qmake executable names that specify the version

2013-04-02 Thread Andrea Scarpino
> On March 31, 2013, 6:11 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > Is this not needed anymore to work under Arch environment? Yes, this is not needed anymore because qmake always refers to Qt5 in Arch. The qt4 package doesn't ship qmake anymore and /usr/lib/qt4/bin isn't in $PATH. The /usr/bin/*-qt4 syml

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >

Re: Review Request 109792: Update 'dim display' algorithm.

2013-04-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by > > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some > > systems. > > > > There is no other alternative than this? > > Danny Baumann wrote: >