> On April 1, 2013, 7:16 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > the SandyBridge situation seems to be more complex. I am using a
> > SandyBridge myself and are *not* experiencing this issue (just tested
> > again). So a general block all SandyBridge would be too broad.
> >
> > Furthermore I hope that
> On April 1, 2013, 10:18 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Qt 4.8 seems like it was released 1.5 years ago, if we need it for a
> > feature I don't see why we should not increase the requirement
I agree. Even RHEL 6.2 seems to be able to build Qt 4.8, so it doesn't seem
like a severe require
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109814/#review30235
---
Qt 4.8 seems like it was released 1.5 years ago, if we need it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109814/
---
(Updated April 1, 2013, 6:41 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace.
Cha
> On April 1, 2013, 6:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > All changes in requirements should be discussed on the k-c-d mailing list
> > first.
What we just do (k-c-d is CC'd as group on the RR)
Though I just noticed that the dated kdelibs version required in master (4.9.4)
does not have the Qt 4.8.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109814/#review30222
---
All changes in requirements should be discussed on the k-c-d ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109814/
---
Review request for kde-workspace.
Description
---
http://git.reviewbo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109809/
---
(Updated April 1, 2013, 7:17 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and kw
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109809/#review30216
---
the SandyBridge situation seems to be more complex. I am using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109748/
---
(Updated April 1, 2013, 4:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109748/#review30214
---
This review has been submitted with commit
21826b84c194e19da22
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109809/
---
Review request for kde-workspace.
Description
---
There have been a n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109607/
---
(Updated April 1, 2013, 11:08 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109607/#review30203
---
This review has been submitted with commit
f18065df9b91c72a813
> On March 20, 2013, 2:20 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > I'm ok with this, though I have two reservations:
> >
> > * other notification systems do not support rich text
> > * we should probably define a subset of rich text that is guaranteed to be
> > supported
This patch will be applied in 4
> On March 31, 2013, 4:14 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > To be honest I don't like adding yet another configuration option by
> > default, a configuration option that apparently is needed only in some
> > systems.
> >
> > There is no other alternative than this?
Well, I don't see any. I tried
16 matches
Mail list logo
