---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108570/
---
Review request for kde-workspace.
Description
---
In page 'entries',
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Martin Sandsmark
wrote:
> Distinguished Sirs and Madams,
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
>> Mangonel has just been moved to KDE Review.
>
> The KDE Review process is set to be two weeks, and if Mangonel calculator
> isn't compl
On 22.01.2013 17:50, Cristian Tibirna wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013 21:22:42 John Layt wrote:
>> My big concern is that KDE is sleep-walking into a hodge-podge
>> solution with little co-ordination on implementations and dependencies, and
>> little knowledge of the implications of the decision
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 08:33:55 Till Adam wrote:
> That was me, it seems, please accept my apologies. I was under the imression
> that "commit to 4.10, merge 4.10 into master" is the recommended work flow.
> If I understand correctly the problem was that I committed to a 4.10 that
> had jus
Hi,
Just a quick notice that as the infrastructure has now been adjusted,
both repositories have now been set free from their locks.
However, please make sure that your checkouts of KDE/4.10 are not
contaminated before you perform a push - it is not possible for our
hooks to block this from happe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108560/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary (updated)
-
Fix kconf
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Till Adam wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2013 19:33:30 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>
>
>> Just a quick notice that due to a accidental merge from KDE/4.10 into
>
>> master in both the kdepim and kdepimlibs repositories, both have been
>
>> locked.
>
>> A force push has
