Re: Review Request: Fix generating kconfig skeletons with UrlList fields that have a default value

2012-12-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107716/#review23516 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Laszlo Papp On Dec. 14, 2012, 1:17 p.m.

Re: Review Request: Keep clickmessage text visible when empty and focused

2012-12-15 Thread Laszlo Papp
> On Dec. 12, 2012, 6:43 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote: > > It did not get a ship it back then for the plasma components, but I would > > not like to block the rediscussion, just saying what happened earlier. :-) > > > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104895/ > > David Edmundson wrote: > One

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 15 de desembre de 2012, a les 15:41:37, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > > cmake 2.8.8 > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsyste

Re: Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 15 December 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with > cmake 2.8.8 > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589 > http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html > > But cmake 2.8

Boost vs cmake 2.8.8 vs kdepimlibs master

2012-12-15 Thread Albert Astals Cid
There seems to be various reports of kdepimlibs master not working with cmake 2.8.8 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7589 http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2012-December/006566.html But cmake 2.8.8 is what we are requiring at the global kdelibs level. Should we: