>
> Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
> work.
>
python3 _support_
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sven Brauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
> Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
> kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
> match kdevplatform ver
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
Alle giovedì 6 dicembre 2012, Sven Brauch ha scritto:
> If you find any issues, please tell me so I can fix them as quickly
> as possible.
The embedded (and modified) copy of python 2.7.1 does not seem a good
idea... is there *really* no way to use an external (lib)python?
It seems python gets so
> On Dec. 6, 2012, 9:15 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, how?
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git pull
> > git checkout
> > git rebase KDE/frameworks
> > git checkout KDE/frameworks
> > git merge
> > git push
> >
> > Just verifying i
Hi!
For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
match kdevplatform version numbers). The release seems to be
successful so far, no cr
On 5 December 2012 22:35, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 23 November 2012 02:58:36 Diggory Hardy wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Since this bug — https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245482 — has not
> been
> > addressed and since it makes KDE's trash somewhat incompatible with other
> > implementa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23096
---
Do i also need to push this to the frameworks branch? If so, ho
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23095
---
This review has been submitted with commit
23ba25b6505dc7f46f8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107276/#review23084
---
Sorry for the late reply, I'm not active in KDE anymore (and so
Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2012, 15:25:21 schrieb Jan Kundrát:
> On Tuesday, 4 December 2012 13:03:57 CEST, Burkhard Lück wrote:
> > Scripty does not like your message extraction, see
> > ftp://l10n.kde.org/121204.trunk_l10n-kde4.
>
> Hi Burkhard,
> the latest log [1] looks fine to me. Could you ple
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 19:43:13 CEST, Jan Kundrát wrote:
I'm hereby requesting a review for a move below the extragear/pim.
Hi,
I believe that the only issue which was raised during the review was
incompatible l10n. After applying several rolls of the duck type, the whole
mess appears
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107520/#review23060
---
Ship it!
The code is a lot simpler, therefore this looks prett
Hey everyone
The "nepomuk-core" [1] package was released with KDE SC 4.9. It contains a
ton of new APIs for Nepomuk, along with the apis in kdelibs/nepomuk, under
a new Nepomuk2 namespace.
Luca Beltrame had put me in touch with Simon about this in July and August,
but no progress has been made. I
15 matches
Mail list logo
