Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Lamarque V. Souza
Em Saturday 03 November 2012, Ben Cooksley escreveu: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijous, 1 de novembre de 2012, a les 21:52:20, Lamarque V. Souza va > > > > escriure: > >> Em Thursday 01 November 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu: > >> > El Dijous, 1 de novem

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, nihui wrote: > hi > please move kimtoy to extragear/utils KIMToy has now been moved to extragear/utils. Please do take note of the comments made in the review period, namely that about a shared library for the applet and application to share between themselves. >

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dijous, 1 de novembre de 2012, a les 21:52:20, Lamarque V. Souza va > escriure: >> Em Thursday 01 November 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu: >> > El Dijous, 1 de novembre de 2012, a les 21:35:45, Lamarque V. Souza va >> > >> > escriure

Re: [RFC] Solution for duplicated or false review/bug notifications

2012-11-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> tl;dr >> I propose to treat public KDE git branches (for all repos) having >> '-work' suffix in a special way: ignore REVIEW and BUG/CCBUG lines. >> When commit hits a public KDE git branch without -work suffix, cur

Re: [RFC] Solution for duplicated or false review/bug notifications

2012-11-02 Thread Luigi Toscano
Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > tl;dr > I propose to treat public KDE git branches (for all repos) having > '-work' suffix in a special way: ignore REVIEW and BUG/CCBUG lines. > When commit hits a public KDE git branch without -work suffix, current > behaviour is preserved. > > ** The problem: > Wheneve

Re: what I am missing for kdeclative

2012-11-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday, 2012-11-02, guy-kde wrote: > Hi Kevin! > > On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:07:08 +0100, Kevin Krammer > > wrote: > > Hi Guy, > > > > On Friday, 2012-11-02, guy-kde wrote: > >> Hello again! > >> > >> Using > >> > >> https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/mast

Re: what I am missing for kdeclative

2012-11-02 Thread guy-kde
Hi Kevin! On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:07:08 +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote: Hi Guy, On Friday, 2012-11-02, guy-kde wrote: Hello again! Using https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/ entry/experimental/libkdeclarative/kdeclarative.h I think kdelibs/master is cu

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, November 2, 2012 19:31:34 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Divendres, 2 de novembre de 2012, a les 12:32:02, Sebastian Kügler va > > escriure: > > On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > The following also appears to have failed to send a email requesting > > > revie

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 2 de novembre de 2012, a les 12:32:02, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > The following also appears to have failed to send a email requesting > > review: - Stackfolder Plasma Applet (stackfolder) > > We're reviewing it righ

Re: what I am missing for kdeclative

2012-11-02 Thread Kevin Krammer
Hi Guy, On Friday, 2012-11-02, guy-kde wrote: > Hello again! > > Using > https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/ > entry/experimental/libkdeclarative/kdeclarative.h I think kdelibs/master is currently unused (not updated). Try branch KDE/4.10 Cheers, Kevin

what I am missing for kdeclative

2012-11-02 Thread guy-kde
Hello again! Using https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdelibs/repository/revisions/master/entry/experimental/libkdeclarative/kdeclarative.h I can see the new functions componentsTarget defaultComponentsTarget These (maybe some more) are NOT included by using: git clone git://anongit.

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Friday, November 2, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote: > - appmenu kded module (kded-appmenu) hopefully someone speaks for this one (i've CC'd Cedric to ensure he's aware) so that it can move into a proper home. i've been using it now since it hit kdereview and it works rather well. > - Stack

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, November 02, 2012 09:24:02 Ben Cooksley wrote: > The following also appears to have failed to send a email requesting review: > - Stackfolder Plasma Applet (stackfolder) We're reviewing it right now, so I suppose it won't skip the next step after that (i.e. the move). Thanks for the n

Re: What is the git workflow for kdelibs ?

2012-11-02 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 01 November 2012 20:44:14 Christoph Feck wrote: > On Thursday 01 November 2012 12:05:51 David Faure wrote: > > as soon as we branch out other modules for 4.10, we'll reopen > > master, it will be less confusing to everyone. > > Good grief :P I just mean instead of having a "4.11" befo

Re: Cleaning house: KDE Review

2012-11-02 Thread Laszlo Papp
> I think libs would be a much better place then. +1 Laszlo