> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
> On July 27, 2012, 8:50 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens when
> > navigating, in that window? Doesn't the combo then start to be messed up
> > (the code assuming that it is editable, has history items, has completion,
> > etc.) ... esp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105749/
---
(Updated July 27, 2012, 8:52 a.m.)
Review request for Dolphin, KDE Base Ap
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105749/#review16512
---
I like the idea, but why the non-editable combo? What happens w
