Fwd: KCategorizedView bug?

2012-07-11 Thread Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
Hi there, I can't use KCategorizedView: when I add more items -after the view has been setup- then KCategorizedView calls recursively to visualRect and crash. This is the bug I reported (it contains a simple use case in wich the class fails): https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303228 Also, yo

Re: Re: Does KDE Desktop want a full-width mouse/pointer Button State mask?

2012-07-11 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 10:02:57 Rick Stockton wrote: > On 07/10/2012 07:17 AM, Rick Stockton wrote: > > It's awfully late for an API change to Qt5, but this would be an > > awkward Backward Compatibility problem to attempt in later Qt5 > > Releases: Should Qt5 present a 32-bit Button State mask?

Re: kdelibs 4.8 merged into 4.9

2012-07-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimecres, 11 de juliol de 2012, a les 10:25:53, Albert Astals Cid va escriure: > This merge brought this commit > > http://quickgit.kde.org/index.php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commitdiff&h=1e83dcea50e26 > cb4fb3e41c1e4dbf6399983b43c&hp=d22058af20b31e4c6dcac9e2c5bfb101bd2a6c20 > > Which is not correct i

Re: Does KDE Desktop want a full-width mouse/pointer Button State mask?

2012-07-11 Thread Rick Stockton
On 07/10/2012 07:17 AM, Rick Stockton wrote: It's awfully late for an API change to Qt5, but this would be an awkward Backward Compatibility problem to attempt in later Qt5 Releases: Should Qt5 present a 32-bit Button State mask? Oops, that's WRONG. My initial "32 mouse buttons" updates already

Re: Review Request: proper fix for my inexcusable commit without review

2012-07-11 Thread David Faure
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:53:33 Jaime Torres Amate wrote: > Should i commit it to branch KDE/4.8 & 4.9? (Do i have to send any email to > the release team?) If this fixes a frequent/severe crash in 4.9, then yes, and yes. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by No

Re: Review Request: proper fix for my inexcusable commit without review

2012-07-11 Thread Jaime Torres Amate
Should i commit it to branch KDE/4.8 & 4.9? (Do i have to send any email to the release team?) David Faure escribió: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105364/#review15666

Re: Review Request: Remove image/x-wmf and image/x-xfig from image thumbnailer's supported mimetypes

2012-07-11 Thread Hui Ni
> On July 11, 2012, 12:36 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > KMimeTypeTrader::query honours the sorting, so InitialPreference=10 should > > have been enough in your thumbnailer. > > > > preferredService() basically calls first() ;) > > > > Patch is OK however. > > Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: >

Re: Review Request: Remove image/x-wmf and image/x-xfig from image thumbnailer's supported mimetypes

2012-07-11 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> On July 11, 2012, 12:36 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > KMimeTypeTrader::query honours the sorting, so InitialPreference=10 should > > have been enough in your thumbnailer. > > > > preferredService() basically calls first() ;) > > > > Patch is OK however. IIRC I tried InitialPreference=10 but

Re: Review Request: Remove image/x-wmf and image/x-xfig from image thumbnailer's supported mimetypes

2012-07-11 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105371/#review15667 --- KMimeTypeTrader::query honours the sorting, so InitialPreferenc

Re: Review Request: proper fix for my inexcusable commit without review

2012-07-11 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105364/#review15666 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On June 29, 2012, 4:22 p.m.

Re: Review Request: Add Configure Desktop Search button (to open Nepomuk KCM) into Nepomukcontroller Statuswidget

2012-07-11 Thread Vishesh Handa
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102523/#review15658 --- Ping? Could you please update this for Nepomuk2, and then comm

kdelibs 4.8 merged into 4.9

2012-07-11 Thread Albert Astals Cid
This merge brought this commit http://quickgit.kde.org/index.php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commitdiff&h=1e83dcea50e26cb4fb3e41c1e4dbf6399983b43c&hp=d22058af20b31e4c6dcac9e2c5bfb101bd2a6c20 Which is not correct in 4.9 Can anyone fix it? Cheers, Albert