Re: Review Request: Don't append "0-" when dragging and dropping from trash

2012-06-18 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105078/#review14874 --- Good idea, but it seems to break the case where nested dirs exi

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 18 June 2012 22:26:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Which "David" is the David in sebas email ? David Edmundson. > (also, which Alex ?) Alex Fiestas. Cheers! -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Matthew Dawson
On June 18, 2012 07:21:29 PM Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > know the current state of the release and commit new features or new > > > strings when we are frozen, and that's with just one release schedule, i > > > can imagine the mess with N different release schedules > > > > "Always summer in t

Re: Review Request: kjs: Implement JSON.parse

2012-06-18 Thread Bernd Buschinski
> On June 10, 2012, 6:57 p.m., Maks Orlovich wrote: > > kjs/json_object.cpp, line 37 > > > > > > What namespace do the symbols for this end up in? > > like all other generated luts, in the KJS namespace > On June

Re: Review Request: kjs: Implement JSON.parse

2012-06-18 Thread Bernd Buschinski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105056/ --- (Updated June 18, 2012, 10:25 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs. Changes

Re: Review Request: kjs: FunctionObject prototype attribute should be [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: false

2012-06-18 Thread Bernd Buschinski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105122/ --- (Updated June 18, 2012, 10:23 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs. Changes

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, June 18, 2012 19:21:29 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > know the current state of the release and commit new features or new > > > strings when we are frozen, and that's with just one release schedule, i > > > can imagine the mess with N different release schedules > > > > "Always summer

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 18 June 2012, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 18 June 2012 10:48:43 David Jarvie wrote: > > I'd rather see a rule that we keep to a uniform release schedule, > > but perhaps allow individual ad-hoc exceptions if there is a really good > > reason. > > +1. Which "David" is the David in seb

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 17 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Inge Wallin wrote: > > As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are: > > - Splitting the SC into 3 parts > > - Shortening the release cycles significantly. > > > > It seems to me that a current trend

Re: Qt Contributors Summit

2012-06-18 Thread John Layt
On 17 June 2012 13:19, John Layt wrote: > It's short notice, but do we want to meet up again on Wednesday evening for > dinner to discuss plans?  I realise it's short notice but I'm sure we can find > somewhere, any suggestions Berliners?  Non-attendees more than welcome too. There doesn't appear

Re: Review Request: Don't append "0-" when dragging and dropping from trash

2012-06-18 Thread Michael Reeves
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105078/ --- (Updated June 18, 2012, 5:39 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime. Chang

Re: Re: Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > know the current state of the release and commit new features or new > > strings when we are frozen, and that's with just one release schedule, i > > can imagine the mess with N different release schedules > > "Always summer in trunk". As long as releases are not created from the > master bran

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Torgny Nyblom
(Missed k-c-d) On Monday 18 June 2012 19.08.33 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, a les 06:36:33, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > > On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > My concerns: > > > * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (sinc

Re: Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 18 June 2012 19:08:33 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, a les 06:36:33, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > > On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > My concerns: > > > * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you > > >

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, a les 06:36:33, Martin Gräßlin va escriure: > On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > My concerns: > > * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you > > > > propose to release that often you can't expect the same person

Re: Default file manager and folder associations

2012-06-18 Thread Dawit A
I doubt changing the text would make much more difference. People will simply read what they want to read and ignore everything else just as in warning/message dialog boxes! After all the current option itself says "Remember application associations for this file type" not for this specific file or

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread David Faure
On Monday 18 June 2012 10:48:43 David Jarvie wrote: > I'd rather see a rule that we keep to a uniform release schedule, > but perhaps allow individual ad-hoc exceptions if there is a really good > reason. +1. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Sponsored by Nokia to work on K

Re: Review Request: [dolphin] Fix the warning generated by desktop-file-validate for dolphin.desktop

2012-06-18 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105288/#review14836 --- This review has been submitted with commit a7d999b7ba3e3506964

Re: Default file manager and folder associations

2012-06-18 Thread Mark
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Mark wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Thomas Lübking > wrote: >> Am 17.06.2012, 22:18 Uhr, schrieb Jacopo De Simoi : >> >> >>> so in the end I agree with you that the crucial issue is the misleading >>> caption of the checkbox in the “open with…” dialog.

Re: Review Request: [dolphin] Fix the warning generated by desktop-file-validate for dolphin.desktop

2012-06-18 Thread Peter Penz
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105288/#review14833 --- Ship it! Thanks, looks fine! (btw: from my point of view no re

Re: Default file manager and folder associations

2012-06-18 Thread Mark
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am 17.06.2012, 22:18 Uhr, schrieb Jacopo De Simoi : > > >> so in the end I agree with you that the crucial issue is the misleading >> caption of the checkbox in the “open with…” dialog. >> Who is the right person to discuss with? > > > it's

Re: Review Request: Avoid QDBusConnection Qt warning message for each KUniqueApplication

2012-06-18 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103699/#review14825 --- For the longer term, this problem is fixed in KDE Frameworks 5,

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, June 18, 2012 11:52:46 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote: > >... > > > >> What continuous integration and automated testing? How many apps have > >> any? > > > > That's th

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Monday, June 18, 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you > propose to release that often you can't expect the same person to be doing > packages almost weekly or byweekly given the release dates won't probably > align) >

Re: Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Myriam Schweingruber
Hi everyone, On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote: >... >> What continuous integration and automated testing? How many apps have any? > > That's the point, we need to improve here. Some of this can be done centrally,

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread David Jarvie
On Mon, June 18, 2012 5:36 am, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> My concerns: >> >> * Uncertainity on the "current release state". We have people that don't >> know the current state of the release and commit new features or new >> strings when we

Re: Review Request: fix kio_activities cannot handle utf8 file name/path

2012-06-18 Thread Xuetian Weng
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105222/ --- (Updated June 18, 2012, 6:09 a.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Ivan

Review Request: [dolphin] Fix the warning generated by desktop-file-validate for dolphin.desktop

2012-06-18 Thread Jekyll Wu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105288/ --- Review request for KDE Base Apps and Peter Penz. Description --- "des

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

2012-06-18 Thread Shaun Reich
>  * The difficulty of coding for N releases. Since the releases an not aligned > anymore, you have to maintain code and #ifdefs for new features that depend on > new versions of parts X of the stack that may or might not be used by people > compiling the application. We've have some bad experience