On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> My concerns:
>
> * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you
> propose to release that often you can't expect the same person to be doing
> packages almost weekly or byweekly given the release dates won't probab
> I've created a new page at http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS/QCS_2012
I would suggest using "QtCS" on these wiki pages for consistency. From
the event page:
"The Qt Contributors Summit (aka QtCS) is the main event of the Qt Project."
Perhaps, it is just me, but the QtCS 2011 url is broken in
El Divendres, 15 de juny de 2012, a les 13:05:44, Sebastian Kügler va
escriure:
> Hi all,
Hi
> During our sprint in Pineda de Mar, we sat down and thought about how our
> release cycles relate to the structures in our software, we came up with the
> following proposal we'd like you to consider a
Am 17.06.2012, 22:18 Uhr, schrieb Jacopo De Simoi :
so in the end I agree with you that the crucial issue is the misleading
caption of the checkbox in the “open with…” dialog.
Who is the right person to discuss with?
it's not like i didn't have to look it up myself (lxr.kde.org)
http://api.kde
On Sunday 17 June 2012 19:17:41 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> You want to open directories with the default mime handler just as images
> or an mp3, that's why they're there.
> If someone sets an "rm -rf $1" script as default directory handler, that's
> actually his problem - you can't fix stupidity.
Am 17.06.2012, 18:18 Uhr, schrieb Jacopo De Simoi :
a mounted media /is/ inode/directory,
if you want to treat things differently you'd need sth. more advanced
that inspects path or content and runs a special app in case. -> bash
script + service file or write sth. with a nifty config gui.
Let
On Sunday 17 June 2012 17:51:26 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> afaics the original forum request turns out to be a misassumption
> about what "remember" does when "opening with..." -> the should or
> could be "add to associations" checkbox (even if that would be done
> automatically, just for disambiation
afaics the original forum request turns out to be a misassumption
about what "remember" does when "opening with..." -> the should or
could be "add to associations" checkbox (even if that would be done
automatically, just for disambiation)
a mounted media /is/ inode/directory,
if you want to treat
On Sunday 17 June 2012 03:44:04 Inge Wallin wrote:
> As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are:
> - Splitting the SC into 3 parts
Yep.
> - Shortening the release cycles significantly.
Nope. The presented numbers were totally made up and random just for
illustration, could
On Sunday 17 June 2012 12:21:07 todd rme wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi
wrote:
> > Dear kcd,
> >
> > I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not
> > make
> > up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
> >
> > - T
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 08:18:05 Maksim Orlovich wrote:
> How do you reconcile this proposal with our current troubles in 4.8.4,
> where you need certain particular combinations of two sets of
> libraries for things not to blow up? Your proposal increases the
> number of combinations in wide use
Hi,
We have the Qt Contributors Summit coming next week and I thought we might
want to try co-ordinate our efforts there like we did last year.
I've created a new page at http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS/QCS_2012 for
KDE attendees to put down their details and any issues they want to see
di
That doesn't quite work, for me at least. See the bug I reported
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297720
Nobody seems to care though.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, todd rme wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wrote:
>> Dear kcd,
>>
>> I am thinking for a possible
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wrote:
> Dear kcd,
>
> I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not make
> up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
>
> - There is no explicit way of setting the default file manager for the K
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Inge Wallin wrote:
> As far as I could understand from the above the main ideas are:
> - Splitting the SC into 3 parts
> - Shortening the release cycles significantly.
>
> It seems to me that a current trend in larger free software projects is to go
which projec
On 06/16/2012 09:44 PM, Inge Wallin wrote:
My problem is with the second. While some people always want to have the
latest and greatest, I wonder what it will do to stability. You didn't write
anything above about how many bugfix updates any given version would receive.
The shorter the release c
Dear kcd,
I am thinking for a possible fix for bug #293576 [1], but I could not make
up my mind so far. As far as I understand the situation is as follows:
- There is no explicit way of setting the default file manager for the KDE
workspace; however, there is an implicit way of doing that
On Friday 15 June 2012 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>
> Opinions?
The predictability and synchronicity of our current six month release cycle
has a lot of benefits. It allows all contributors as well as consumers of our
releases to plan ahead and minimizes release overhead.
On the other hand it wou
18 matches
Mail list logo
