---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104983/
---
(Updated May 22, 2012, 7:14 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
--
Sebastian
Change of plans. As per recent discussions with tsdgeos and kde_pepo on
#kde-devel -
They would like to avoid too many new repositories. So, if it's okay with
you we'll keep the nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio code in
kde-runtime, while the rest can be removed as it is there in n
El Dilluns, 21 de maig de 2012, a les 18:31:25, Daniel Nicoletti va escriure:
> Hi,
> Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
> it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make
> sense to keep it there anymore.
>
> So please review the code, make suggestions and such...
AppSetup doesn't seem to b
Extragear, as I depend on PackageKit releases
this would be more flexible for me :)
Best,
2012/5/22 Anne-Marie Mahfouf :
> On 05/21/2012 11:31 PM, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
>> it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make
>> sense to keep it t
Does anyone have suggestions on where nepomuk-kde-kio and
nepomuk-kde-config should be placed?
I was thinking under kde-baseaps, but that might not be correct. Any
suggestions?
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > I think we
On 05/21/2012 11:31 PM, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
Hi,
Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make
sense to keep it there anymore.
So please review the code, make suggestions and such...
Right now the code is at (I've asked kde sysadmin to move to
kdere
> Right now the code is at (I've asked kde sysadmin to move to
> kdereview, but afaik it will only reflect the projects url):
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/sysadmin/apper/repository
Yes, the repository can be found here while reviewing:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/
Hi,
Apper is on playground probably since 2008,
it's widely used nowadays so it doesn't make
sense to keep it there anymore.
So please review the code, make suggestions and such...
Right now the code is at (I've asked kde sysadmin to move to
kdereview, but afaik it will only reflect the projects
Hi Todd,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
> What is the criteria for a mailing list being "dead"?
No mails since several months. Also the sysadmins see those easily as
they usually cause a lot of bou
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:54 AM, todd rme wrote:
>
> Another issue: are mailing lists the proper way to be distributing
> bugzilla notifications, or should those be handled by subscriptions
> inside bugzilla? From the discussions I have seen the latter is
> supposed to be the preferred method, b
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> a quality discussion on IRC this morning triggered a few question I
> think are best addressed to this list.
>
> 1. I don't question that KDE has several groups that need a mailing
> list with a private archive, only
Hi everyone,
a quality discussion on IRC this morning triggered a few question I
think are best addressed to this list.
1. I don't question that KDE has several groups that need a mailing
list with a private archive, only accessible to subscribers, but what
is the reason to make mailing lists hi
12 matches
Mail list logo
