Re: Review Request: KJS: improve regex flag scanning

2012-05-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104974/#review13944 --- This review has been submitted with commit e2f5d87a29f4a06b305

Re: Review Request: Define tooltips for kdeui standard actions

2012-05-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104934/#review13940 --- This review has been submitted with commit 9cfafa78940e7db68f0

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... I think as long as you didn't advertise the D-Bus in

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > > wrote: > > > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > > wrote: > > > I think w

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/17/2012 10:08 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela > wrote: > > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg mailto:tr...@kde.org>> > wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are > the DBus >

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... Great. thanks. hugs and kisses /Sune > > On 05/17/2012 09:

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> @Packagers: We will

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: > @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in > nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of > things. NACK. this is a completely no go. /Sune

Review Request: KJS: improve regex flag scanning

2012-05-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104974/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Description --- Only scan the list of fla

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 17 de maig de 2012, a les 19:31:14, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > Hey > @Translators: You probably want to preserve the translations in > kde-runtime/nepomuk. How do we go about this? That's not a problem. Albert

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Allen Winter
On Thursday 17 May 2012 10:01:14 AM Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-config [3] > > kde-runtime/nepomuk will be re

Re: Review Request: Added option for disabling the offer to save website passwords in Konqueror

2012-05-17 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
> On April 26, 2012, 5:09 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > If i understand you correctly you are suggesting to create a bug (option > > that does nothing)? > > > > Doesn't make much sense. > > Dawit Alemayehu wrote: > Huh ? I do not follow. By "option that does nothing" you mean this cha

Re: Review Request: Use the focus proxy, if present, as parent of KonqPopupMenu

2012-05-17 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
> On May 9, 2012, 7:37 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > This makes no sense to me. Popping up a context menu has nothing to do with > > keyboard focus, and the actual cause for the bug hasn't been identified, > > apparently. So this is a "blind workaround", which I cannot approve. > > Dawit Alemay

Re: Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Forgot to add the correct kde-packagers email. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Hey > > I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. > > As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - > > * nepomuk-core [1] > * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] > * nepomuk-kde-co

Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

2012-05-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey I just thought everyone should know what's going on with Nepomuk. As per 4.9, we are going to have 3 repositories - * nepomuk-core [1] * nepomuk-kde-kio [2] * nepomuk-kde-config [3] kde-runtime/nepomuk will be removed. Kdelibs will not be touched. All the headers are being installed under n

Review Request: Plasma::RunnerManager: only dequeue our ThreadWeaver jobs

2012-05-17 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104973/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Description --- When RunnerManager::reset

Re: KDELibsNightly.cmake

2012-05-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
Hi, I think this techbase article is pretty much up-to-date. I guess the KDElibsNighly.cmake file should simply be deleted. http://techbase.kde.org/Development/CMake/DashboardBuilds On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > I wanted to run a (single) nightly build of kdelibs to s

KDELibsNightly.cmake

2012-05-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
I wanted to run a (single) nightly build of kdelibs to see how the coverage changes when the ECMAtest is used. There is a KDELibsNightly.cmake file in the root directory of kdelibs, but that still talks about svn. Changing that may be easy, but the KDECTestNightly.cmake referenced in there that

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-17 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 10:40 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Sebastian Trüg wrote: > >> On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >>> What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? >>> >>> Or since those are just APIs they can wait. >> >> I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. >>