Moving "scheck" from kdesdk to tags/unmaintained/4/scheck ?

2012-05-16 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, in preparation of the migration of kdesk to git I found that scheck in kdesdk is currently excluded from the build, because it has been never completely ported to Qt4/KDE4. And it seems noone has missed it for 4 years, perhaps accel conflicts & Co. are no longer a big problem? Thus I will

Re: Review Request: Define tooltips for kdeui standard actions

2012-05-16 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104934/#review13901 --- Time is running: soft-message-freeze is tomorrow. I am going to

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? >> >> Or since those are just APIs they can wait. > > I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. > Just so there's no surprises later: all nepomuk stuff

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:52 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg >

Re: Review Request: Require Qt 4.8 in kdelibs KDE/4.8 branch

2012-05-16 Thread Andre Heinecke
> On April 13, 2012, 9:51 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote: > > The commit that has caused the compilation problem has already been > > addressed: > > > > http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/cd71839b04d7c754b9ec18f7b56522958b504006 > > http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs/d82f313500f9e4fe3a7e5ddef43650c31b59c8

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > > On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > > wrote: > > > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > > > Feel free to imple

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 09:16 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". > > Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch > might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. > If you do not I would appreciate a

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Pushed my stuff to branch "feature/nepomuk2Includes". Feel free to implement Ivan's fancier solution. In that case my branch might at least help in finding the places where stuff needs replacing. If you do not I would appreciate a look over my branch to check if I missed sth. Cheers, Sebastian O

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. > > I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. > The facets are qu

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
On 05/16/2012 08:23 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? > > Or since those are just APIs they can wait. I say let's postpone them, they are still in kdelibs. The facets are quite weird and I am not sure about releasing them again. The ui stuff -

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Vishesh Handa
What about kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/* and the other ui stuff? Or since those are just APIs they can wait. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > I now prepared the required repositories: > > scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio > contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves > > scratch/trueg/nep

Re: [Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

2012-05-16 Thread Sebastian Trüg
I now prepared the required repositories: scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-kio contains the 3 Nepomuk kio slaves scratch/trueg/nepomuk-kde-config contains the KCM and the controller systray app The question is: where should we move them? Something like "KDE/Base"? I suppose questions like these hav

Re: kio and frameworks 5

2012-05-16 Thread Ben Martin
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:52 +0200, todd rme wrote: ... > One question I think might be worth asking is "what (if anything) is > kio missing?" We have applications that do device or file access, > such as ark and k3b, that are not using kio slaves for that access. > Why not? Is it just a lack of t

Re: kio and frameworks 5

2012-05-16 Thread Ben Martin
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:22 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, May 11, 2012 21:33:35 Casper Clemence wrote: > > Libferris is an awesome piece of technology. It provides not just the > > traditional features of a VFS but a uniform method of access for > > applications and users to a large and