Seems perfect, no breaking, no kdelibs modification.
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
Does anyone have any objections to the current plan?
* Remove kde-runtime/nepomuk
* All nepomuk development happens in nepomuk-core
* nepomuk-core will install everything with a Nepomuk2 namespace
* Applications will have to explicitly depend on nepomuk-core if they want
to use the new APIs
T
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104908/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
kjs: Fix Errorprototype i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104906/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
kjs: Introduce & use left
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104907/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
kjs: Update Error.prototy
> On May 10, 2012, 8:41 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only ones that
> > work, and the other ones are disabled?
> >
> > IMHO this is enabled/disabled, not preferred (which sounds like the other
> > ones are working, just harder to reach)
> On May 10, 2012, 8:41 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only ones that
> > work, and the other ones are disabled?
> >
> > IMHO this is enabled/disabled, not preferred (which sounds like the other
> > ones are working, just harder to reach)
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
> On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh optional perhaps?
> > I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
> > tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
> > disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that be
> On May 10, 2012, 8:38 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > As documented, the shortcut(types) method allows to retrieve either the
> > current shortcuts (like most other methods), or the *default* shortcuts,
> > i.e. those that were set by the application developer initially, before the
> > user cou
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104900/#review13653
---
Preferred? I'm confused. Aren't the checked keywords the only o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104801/#review13648
---
As documented, the shortcut(types) method allows to retrieve ei
17 matches
Mail list logo
