Re: TechBase git policies, infrastructure documentation, please

Alexander Neundorf wrote: > It would be just *great* if you could put this on techbase.kde.org :-) I'd suggest you just copy it into wherever you would look for it. Mostly it's not kde specific anyway. It's just about knowing how to use git. Thanks, Steve.

Re: TechBase git policies, infrastructure documentation, please

On Sunday 29 April 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 29 April 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> > git is a powerful tool, and you can use it in many different ways. It > >> > needs to be easy to find out how git is intended to be used

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Monday 07 May 2012, Vishesh Handa wrote: ... > So, we're down to 3 options - > > *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs is not touched. > *Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious crashes if both > libraries are loaded. > > *2.* nepomuk-core installs headers und

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > There's some problem of communication here. > > Let me try to explain myself better. As far as I understand: > * Dolphin uses the "old" api at the moment and works "fine" > Yup. > * When the change you propose (adding new apis), you

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 22:09:01, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > El Dijous, 3 de

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Monday, 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > > So you mean yes, they can, they do now and can still do it, even if > using > > > the > > > "old" APIs are suboptimal. > > > >

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Monday, 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > So you mean yes, they can, they do now and can still do it, even if using > > the > > "old" APIs are suboptimal. > > > > Right? > > I'm sorry. What? I think what Albert is asking is wheth

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > I'm not okay with applications having to stick with the old faulty APIs > > I'm not okay with a api or abi break in kdelibs. > Of course. But that is not what is happening. The current solution we pr

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > I'm not okay with applications having to stick with the old faulty APIs I'm not okay with a api or abi break in kdelibs. /Sune

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va > escriure: > > > > Hey everyone!

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

El Dilluns, 7 de maig de 2012, a les 11:48:00, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dijous, 3 de maig de 2012, a les 00:32:37, Vishesh Handa va escriure: > > > Hey everyone! > > > > > > snip > > > > > > The second solution is - > > > * nepo

Package Dependcies List on Techbase

Howdy, I started putting the list of package dependences (arranged by module) onto Techbase. http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/Requirements The tables on the subpages there are generated by a perl program I wrote. That program reads the CMakeLists.txt files inside a module and genera

Re: Review Request: Avoid using QDialog::exec in kpasswdserver to address long standing issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104817/#review13540 --- This review has been submitted with commit a3051b8fe4ddb4f315b

Re: Review Request: KMessageWidget: Adapt height to text changes

> On May 2, 2011, 5:49 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > Thanks for the patch Mattias! This is indeed an annoying bug but your fix > > does not work when the widget is resized. heightForWidth() needs to be > > implemented I think. > > Matthias Fuchs wrote: > The problem is that resizing tak

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

Maybe there could be something like qt has - BEGIN_NEPOMUK_NAMESPACE... So that if the same needs to be done in the future, we could just change the macro value. I don't know, thinking that Nepomuk2 namespace is looking rather ugly :) The dirtiest solution library-wise would be to have everythi

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On 05/07/2012 03:47 PM, ivan.cu...@gmail.com wrote: > Maybe there could be something like qt has - BEGIN_NEPOMUK_NAMESPACE... So > that if the same needs to be done in the future, we could just change the > macro value. That would be much more work since each cpp file has the namespaces in the m

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg > > wrote: > > > > > > On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > > So, we're down to 3 options

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On 05/07/2012 02:35 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg > wrote: > > > On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > So, we're down to 3 options - > > > > *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > So, we're down to 3 options - > > > > *1.* nepomuk-core become a dependency of kdelibs. Kdelibs is not touched. > > *Problem:* Overlapping headers and possible mysterious crashes if both >

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On 05/07/2012 12:09 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Faure > wrote: > > On Monday 07 May 2012 13:06:15 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela > wrote: > > > On 20

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 07 May 2012 13:06:15 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > > On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > > Right. > > > > > > > > We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepo

Re: Review Request: Avoid using QDialog::exec in kpasswdserver to address long standing issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104817/#review13526 --- Smart pointers without a purpose, just make reading the code ha

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Monday 07 May 2012 13:06:15 Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > > Right. > > > > > > We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and > > > just > > > making nepomuk-core a dependency of kd

Re: Pairs going to KDE Edu

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 1 de maig de 2012, a les 22:16:44, Aleix Pol va escriure: >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: >> >> написане Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:36:38 +0300, Aleix

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Right. > > > > We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just > > making nepomuk-core a dependency of kdelibs. But that would result in > both > > nepomuk-core and kdelibs in

Re: The Nepomuk Situation

On 2012-05-07, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Right. > > We could maintain BC and SC by not touching the kdelibs nepomuk, and just > making nepomuk-core a dependency of kdelibs. But that would result in both > nepomuk-core and kdelibs installing the same headers. what happens if both libraries are loaded