Re: Re: [kde-freebsd] Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

On Sunday, April 22, 2012 04:40:30 AM Alberto Villa wrote: > I'm not sure that was an official investiture (it was late in the > night - at Randa, do you remember Alex?)... :) I do remember! but I left thinking that it was not worth because freebsd people were working on something new to replace h

Re: [kde-freebsd] Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Wasn't Alberto Villa made responsible for libsolid-hal some time ago? I'm not sure that was an official investiture (it was late in the night - at Randa, do you remember Alex?)... :) Anyway, what would maintaining mean? I can step i

Re: Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

Alex Fiestas writes: > So real question is, who is using libsolid-hal nowdays? At least the BSD people are; nobody came up with a BSD implementation of the *kit/u* stuff from Linux, so we're still using Hal. > Once we know the answer to that question I will: > -Make HAL backend option only avai

Moving libsolid-hal to unmaintained?

Hello everybody! I'm doing some bug triage on libsolid (as well of some bug fixing) and I'm finding that most "nasty" bugs are fault of our HAL backend (or HAL itself). I tried to build HAL and failed on it (easy fix though) but that made me realize that there is no point of me fixing HAL issue

Re: Review Request: kjs: Implement Array.isArray

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104676/#review12766 --- Ship it! kjs/array_object.cpp

Re: Review Request: KJS/Grammar: Introduce new non-terminal IdentifierName, to handle keywords as PropertyName, in Memberexps and CallExpr

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104243/#review12765 --- Hmm, you may have missed my reply on IRC, making this languish

Re: Review Request: KJS: Implement Object.prototypeOf, Object.keys, Object.getOwnPropertyNames

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104511/#review12764 --- Ship it! Please fix the inlining thing. I am also not sure ab

Re: Review Request: kjs: Global NaN, undefined and Infinity should be [[Writable]]: false, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: false

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104678/#review12763 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Maks Orlovich On April 19, 2012, 7:41 p

Re: Review Request: kjs: All prototype constructor should be [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: true

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104680/#review12762 --- Ship it! kjs/interpreter.cpp

Re: Review Request: More kio_sftp login related fixes

> On April 21, 2012, 9:05 a.m., Andreas Schneider wrote: > > Did you also test if keyboard-interactive still works correctly? > > Dawit Alemayehu wrote: > No, because I do not even know how to enable that functionality in my ssh > config and was lazy to search and find out. Just looking at

Re: Review Request: More kio_sftp login related fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104642/#review12748 --- Did you also test if keyboard-interactive still works correctly

Re: Review Request: More kio_sftp login related fixes

> On April 21, 2012, 9:05 a.m., Andreas Schneider wrote: > > Did you also test if keyboard-interactive still works correctly? No, because I do not even know how to enable that functionality in my ssh config and was lazy to search and find out. Just looking at the code though I immediately see

Re: Setting up a Quality Team within KDE

On Saturday 14 April 2012, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Afterwards it runs cppcheck on the source code... > > That is a really nice advantage, if it can be integrated with handy > tools. Although, I would personally like to use much more advanced and > useful tools than cppcheck. > > [...] > > > But o