Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Ottens
> On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes > > will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to > > tier2/ for prime time. > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > Thanks for making this happ

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
> On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 > > > > > > "!QUrl::isLocalFile()"? > > Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote: > isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0

kdelibs splitting: collecting March results

2012-03-30 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello list, For this month I decided to be a bit more relax and not chase after people and see how it goes. Which means this email is going to be probably shorter than usual. :-) So, for this month were earmarked to be splitted out: * kauth; * kcoreaddons (left over from february); * kguiaddon

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 > > > > > > "!QUrl::isLocalFile()"? > > Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote: > isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
> On March 30, 2012, 8:18 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp, line 352 > > > > > > "!QUrl::isLocalFile()"? isLocalFile() was introduced in Qt 4.8.0 and we still use Qt 4.7.4 in Meego ima

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review12037 --- service/jobs/nepomuk/Move.cpp

Re: Review Request: Copy files instead of moving if parent dir is not writable

2012-03-30 Thread Lamarque Vieira Souza
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/ --- (Updated March 30, 2012, 6:57 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Pla

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
> On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes > > will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to > > tier2/ for prime time. > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > Thanks for making this happ

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Dario Freddi
> On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes > > will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to > > tier2/ for prime time. > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > Thanks for making this happ

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
> On March 30, 2012, 1:14 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, these changes > > will be merged on Sunday, after which I'll ask Kevin to move KAuth back to > > tier2/ for prime time. Thanks for making this happen! :) Instead of merging, ple

Re: Review Request: Make KAuth ready for frameworks + API Changes

2012-03-30 Thread Dario Freddi
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104337/#review12013 --- April is upon us. If no objections arise in the time being, the

Re: RFC: i18n: drop KUIT tags in KDE Frameworks 5.0?

2012-03-30 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Albert Astals Cid :] > Discipline is not a problem [...] > [...] > I agree optional is a bad idea. > [...] > OTOH it's another hurdle for adoption of current code from KDE 4 to KF5, > that originally was said to be "transparent" for developers and each day > is getting to look more like a bigg

Re: RFC: i18n: drop KUIT tags in KDE Frameworks 5.0?

2012-03-30 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Stefan Majewsky :] > I'm missing one point in this statistic: How big would the percentage be > if KUIT was used in every relevant string? That is the main point of uncertainty. In here: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=133258732919686&w=2 I made the best estimate I could think of s