> On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
> > Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
> > *moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
> > original
> On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
> > Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
> > *moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
> > original
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Chusslove Illich wrote:
> Only 0.56% of all messages (1144 out of 200,000) contain any [KUIT tags].
I'm missing one point in this statistic: How big would the percentage
be if KUIT was used in every relevant string?
I suspect that most translated strings are sta
> On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
> > Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
> > *moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
> > original
> On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
> > Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
> > *moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
> > original
> On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
> > Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
> > *moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
> > original
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11909
---
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible att
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/
---
(Updated March 27, 2012, 2:22 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and Pla
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11903
---
Hm, moving a .desktop file seems wrong to me in any case, that
> On March 27, 2012, 9:56 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Excuse my naivity here, but how does this make sense? If a user asks to
> > make certain data private, he expects them to be not available in
> > unencrypted fashion anymore. Copying to the encrypted folder doesn't solve
> > this, as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11899
---
Excuse my naivity here, but how does this make sense? If a user
11 matches
Mail list logo
