Re: Review Request: Moving tabs causes wrong tab to be highlighted upon reload

2012-01-24 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
> On Jan. 25, 2012, 12:07 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > konqueror/src/konqtabs.cpp, line 118 > > > > > > Shouldn't this connect be removed then? > > > > Isn't there a risk that both signals get emitted in so

Re: Review Request: Moving tabs causes wrong tab to be highlighted upon reload

2012-01-24 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103740/#review10065 --- konqueror/src/konqtabs.cpp

Re: hard-dep for Qt 4.8

2012-01-24 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am 24.01.2012, 23:59 Uhr, schrieb Boudewijn Rempt : Yes, there's no difference. Try e.g. Choqok or Krita. First it shows a gray rectangle, then hides it, then shows the main window (as a gray rectangle) then paints the splash. This is new in Qt 4.8 and is not dependent on the style. Yupp,

Re: hard-dep for Qt 4.8

2012-01-24 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 Jan, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am 24.01.2012, 23:53 Uhr, schrieb Boudewijn Rempt : > > > > For one thing... In Qt 4.8, QSplashScreen is broken. The splash is only > > painted over a gray rectangle once main window is shown. > > Tried with eg. plastique? (The background

Re: hard-dep for Qt 4.8

2012-01-24 Thread Thomas Lübking
Am 24.01.2012, 23:53 Uhr, schrieb Boudewijn Rempt : For one thing... In Qt 4.8, QSplashScreen is broken. The splash is only painted over a gray rectangle once main window is shown. Tried with eg. plastique? (The background gradient painting of oxygen/bespin/qtcurve could interfere with thi

Re: hard-dep for Qt 4.8

2012-01-24 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 19 January 2012 Jan, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 18 January 2012 10:26:13 Thomas Zander wrote: > > As far as I know there are no forward incompatible behavior changes between > > Qt4.7 and Qt 4.8 > > One can dream :-) ... > There might be more. > For one thing... In Qt 4.8, QSp

Re: KDE Frameworks 5: Rhythm

2012-01-24 Thread Dawit A
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 21 de January de 2012 16.17.38, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> * Thiagos stuff - I don't know. > > Thiago's stuff is: > > - new atomics (wasn't a KDE request): done, just waiting for integration > because of stupid stuff like the copy

Re: KDE Frameworks 5: Rhythm

2012-01-24 Thread Christoph Cullmann
- Original Message - > On Tuesday, 24 de January de 2012 19.26.01, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > just out of curiosity: Why is Intel blocking this to get into Qt? > > The Qt Contribution License Agreement has not been approved > internally yet. Ok, I see. Just was curious if tha

Re: KDE Frameworks 5: Rhythm

2012-01-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 24 de January de 2012 19.26.01, Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi, > > just out of curiosity: Why is Intel blocking this to get into Qt? The Qt Contribution License Agreement has not been approved internally yet. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org S

Re: KDE Frameworks 5: Rhythm

2012-01-24 Thread Christoph Cullmann
- Original Message - > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On Monday, 23 de January de 2012 09.58.46, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> If it does belong to the garbage bin, we should consider getting > >> some > >> stuff into the existing class - making toLower() built into the > >> scheme() > >> etc. >