Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 23 de January de 2012 09.58.46, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> If it does belong to the garbage bin, we should consider getting some
>> stuff into the existing class - making toLower() built into the scheme()
>> etc.
>>
>> Do you have a list of such small fixes?
>
>
On Monday, 23 de January de 2012 09.58.46, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> If it does belong to the garbage bin, we should consider getting some stuff
> into the existing class - making toLower() built into the scheme() etc.
>
> Do you have a list of such small fixes?
No, I don't. If the most glaring, maj
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Saturday, 21 de January de 2012 16.17.38, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> * Thiagos stuff - I don't know.
>
> Thiago's stuff is:
>
> - new atomics (wasn't a KDE request): done, just waiting for integration
> because of stupid stuff like the copyright header not matching exact
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 de January de 2012 12.08.57, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Valentin Rusu wrote:
>> > Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> >>> There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
>> >> * KAction/QAction stuff - Don't know what's needed. If QAction needs
>> >> n
