On Sunday, 22 de January de 2012 12.08.57, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >>> There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> >> * KAction/QAction stuff - Don't know what's needed. If QAction needs new
> >> virtual method that would nee
On Saturday, 21 de January de 2012 16.17.38, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> * Thiagos stuff - I don't know.
Thiago's stuff is:
- new atomics (wasn't a KDE request): done, just waiting for integration
because of stupid stuff like the copyright header not matching exactly what's
expected and my inability
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103740/
---
(Updated Jan. 22, 2012, 6:18 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Da
> On Jan. 21, 2012, 8:43 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> > Your patch fixes the bug, but it also causes a regression: If the tab
> > contains a split view, the tab title is not highlighted any more. It seems
> > that the purpose of the function KonqFrameTabs::tabWhereActive() is to get
> > th
On Sunday 22 January 2012 12:17:45 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 January 2012 20:49:40 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> >> > There's three main reasons for
Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Saturday 21 January 2012 20:49:40 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> > On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> >> > There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
>> >> > * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
>> >>
Valentin Rusu wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
>> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>>> There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
>
>> * KAction/QAction stuff - Don't know what's needed. If QAction needs new
>> virtual method that would need to be determined soon. Is anyone driving
>> that? Again, needs subt
On Saturday 21 January 2012 20:49:40 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> > There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> >> > * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
> >> > * CMake 2.8.8 will be rel
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> * KAction/QAction stuff - Don't know what's needed. If QAction needs new
> virtual method that would need to be determined soon. Is anyone driving
> that? Again, needs subtask here if it's going to happen:
> On Jan. 22, 2012, 9:06 a.m., Erik Sigra wrote:
> > Ship It!
giving yourself a ship it kind of destroys the idea behind review board.
>From my side there is a clear "NO" for everything KWin related. So why? Let's
>consider for example atoms.h. I just used git blame and well the includes were
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103638/#review9996
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Erik Sigra
On Jan. 15, 2012, 12:53 p.m.,
11 matches
Mail list logo