In terms of the SSL stuff, I've had very little feedback of what
people are missing from Qt's SSL.
* I had a request for the ability to enable SSL3 and TLS1 without SSL2 (done)
* I had a request for the ability to enable/disable various
compatibility workarounds (done)
I also had a bunch of thing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103740/#review9993
---
Your patch fixes the bug, but it also causes a regression: If th
On Saturday 21 January 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >> > There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> >> > * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
> >> > * CMake 2.8.8 will be released in
Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Kevin Ottens wrote:
>> > There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
>> > * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
>> > * CMake 2.8.8 will be released in April;
>> > * it'd be nice to release KDE Frameworks 5.0 at
On Saturday 21 January 2012 16:17:38 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> > * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
> > * CMake 2.8.8 will be released in April;
> > * it'd be nice to release KDE Frameworks 5.0 at Akademy[*].
>
> You mean 's
Kevin Ottens wrote:
> There's three main reasons for this rhythm:
> * Qt 5.0 feature freeze is upon us now;
> * CMake 2.8.8 will be released in April;
> * it'd be nice to release KDE Frameworks 5.0 at Akademy[*].
You mean 'some of the frameworks'? They won't all be done by then. More
stuff wil
Oyé oyé braves gens!
As presented at the end of 2011 we started introduce some tools in our wiki to
improve visibility about the ongoing work. I'd say it's working out ok so far
with that aim in mind.
Of course, Christmas and New Year came along and made us fat and slow... Still
I won't let th
