On Wednesday 18 January 2012 06.35.57 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I didn't say that this is a reason. I wanted to highlight the problem of
> not depending on 4.8 and everybody using 4.8. I'm not going to start
> reviewing code for "is this a Qt 4.8 change".
Martin,
if you remember there are a lot of
> On Jan. 17, 2012, 10:28 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > > "The kdeui module is unlikely welcome on mobile platforms"
> >
> > Why is this review about adding stuff to kdeui, then? I don't get it.
> > Either you're using it or you're not using it -- or the real reason is
> > core/gui split in you
> On Jan. 17, 2012, 10:28 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > > "The kdeui module is unlikely welcome on mobile platforms"
> >
> > Why is this review about adding stuff to kdeui, then? I don't get it.
> > Either you're using it or you're not using it -- or the real reason is
> > core/gui split in you
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 17:06:26 Allen Winter wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 January 2012 11:34:19 AM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Friday 13 January 2012 10:06:10 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 22.50.24, Ingo
> > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl�cker?=> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > If you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103719/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Jeremy Paul Whiting.
Description
---
U
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103716/#review9903
---
> "The kdeui module is unlikely welcome on mobile platforms"
Wh
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 11:34:19 AM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2012 10:06:10 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 22.50.24, Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?=
> > wrote:
> > > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> > > test
Em Tuesday 17 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> On Friday 06 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Friday 06 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > > Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> > > > On Thursday 05 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > >
On Friday 06 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 06 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> > > On Thursday 05 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > > > Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> >
On Friday 13 January 2012 10:06:10 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 22.50.24, Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?=
> wrote:
> > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> > tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
> > s
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103716/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Jeremy Paul Whiting.
Description
---
U
Cool :) If no objections arise within the next hours, I'll commit the change
2012/1/17 Alex Fiestas :
> On 01/17/2012 05:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
>> inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads
On 01/17/2012 05:17 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
Howdy,
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also Screensaver inhi
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 05:17:25 Dario Freddi wrote:
> this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
> inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
> inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
> change that to include also Scre
14 matches
Mail list logo
