> On Jan. 16, 2012, 1:48 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > What does "this improves buildability" mean? What was broken, in particular?
> >
> > I'm not objecting to the fix, I would just like to understand why it's
> > necessary for you and not for everyone else ;)
> > (different platform? compiler?
Howdy,
this mail comes after a certain discussion on how to handle screen
inhibition. At the moment, the aforementioned function leads to an
inhibition of DPMS features and brightness handling - I propose to
change that to include also Screensaver inhibition, to provide a full
hassle-free experien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103593/#review9870
---
While it definitely makes sense to make the KDE logout work, isn
> On May 26, 2011, 2:03 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > > Would there even be any good alternative approaches?
> > Yes,
> > - properly read the fontconfig (including global settings)
> > - only write settings actually touched by the user
> > - have a checkbox to disable custom font configuration
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103602/#review9866
---
This review has been submitted with commit
63c7ae800b22d0d9d6d5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103638/#review9862
---
What does "this improves buildability" mean? What was broken, in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103638/
---
(Updated Jan. 15, 2012, 12:53 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and H
