---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103691/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Description
---
The attac
Some food for thought, as if this thread wasn't long enough...take a
look at how much discussion or rejection was given on the dependency
for Qt 4.7 back in 2010.
i.e. nobody responded with objections or otherwise...
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=128500348631281&w=4
--
Shaun Reich,
K
On Friday 13 January 2012, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 22.50.24, Ingo
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?=
> wrote:
> > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code
> > better tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers
> > to do so. I see no
On Friday 13 January 2012, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Am 12.01.2012, 22:50 Uhr, schrieb Ingo Klöcker :
> > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> > tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
> > see no good reason to force developers to do so
> On Jan. 13, 2012, 3:49 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > Ship It!
I'm not the maintainer of kcapacitybar, solid or dolphin, but the patch is
correct, fixes a bug and should enter 4.8.
- Thomas
---
This is an automatically generated e-m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103669/#review9803
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Thomas Lübking
On Jan. 12, 2012, 7:06 p.
Am 12.01.2012, 22:50 Uhr, schrieb Ingo Klöcker :
If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
see no good reason to force developers to do so.
I tend to agree that KDE should not add hard deps for "ma
On Thursday, 12 de January de 2012 22.50.24, Ingo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kl=F6cker?=
wrote:
> If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
> see no good reason to force developers to do so.
You know what ha
fredagen den 13 januari 2012 10.10.58 skrev Mark:
> +1 for putting a hard dep on it.
> Reason: my distribution already has Qt 4.8 (Archlinux) and Qt doesn't
> release new versions for nothing. It's new, generally better, thus should
> be used.
Mark, Qt is forward compatible and thus you can use 4
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 17:47:00 Shaun Reich wrote:
> Prompting motion for making Qt 4.8 a hard dependency for KDE
> 4.9/master. Currently kde-baseapps/plasma/folderview does not build
> against 4.7 due to an (albeit minor) api usage.
>
> Not sure how other areas in KDE fair against this, m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103684/#review9785
---
Ship it!
- David Faure
On Jan. 12, 2012, 6:14 p.m., Dawit Ale
On Fri, January 13, 2012 9:10 am, Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Thomas Zander wrote:
>
>> torsdagen den 12 januari 2012 22.50.24 skrev Ingo Klöcker:
>> > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
>> > tested with this version of Qt then simply ask deve
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Thomas Zander wrote:
> torsdagen den 12 januari 2012 22.50.24 skrev Ingo Klöcker:
> > If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> > tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
> > see no good reason to force d
torsdagen den 12 januari 2012 22.50.24 skrev Ingo Klöcker:
> If you want developers to switch to Qt 4.8 to get the KDE code better
> tested with this version of Qt then simply ask developers to do so. I
> see no good reason to force developers to do so.
+1
--
Thomas Zander
14 matches
Mail list logo
