---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103642/
---
Review request for kdelibs and David Faure.
Description
---
This patc
On Friday 06 January 2012, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > - remove the if(WIN32)
> > around the pkgconfig-stuff. People say it should work also on Windows. So
> > let's see.
>
> But add an if() to check if pkg-config is actually found?
If it's not found, the call to the macro simply does not set any v
> - remove the if(WIN32)
> around the pkgconfig-stuff. People say it should work also on Windows. So
> let's see.
But add an if() to check if pkg-config is actually found?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103631/#review9616
---
We're getting there :-)
...but not yet completely.
You actually
On 06/01/12 12:40, Martin Klapetek wrote:
Nevertheless we later attended the libfolks talk and
it is pretty much the same as Nepomuk's PIMO:Person, except that Nepomuk is
a broader and general platform while folks concentrate solely on contacts.
And given the effort to integrate Nepomuk more deep
El Divendres, 6 de gener de 2012, a les 01:09:40, Albert Astals Cid va
escriure:
> El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:59:10, Lamarque V. Souza va
escriure:
> > Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Albert Astals Cid escreveu:
> > > El Dijous, 5 de gener de 2012, a les 21:35:18, Lamarque V. Souza va
>
On Friday 06 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> Em Thursday 05 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> > On Thursday 05 January 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > > Em Wednesday 04 January 2012, Alexander Neundorf escreveu:
> > > > On Wednesday 04 January 2012, Lamarque Vieira Souza wrot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103631/
---
(Updated Jan. 6, 2012, 1:06 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
--
2012/1/5 Venky
> Wasn't using folks for contact aggregation suggested few months by Paolo
> Capriotti? If I remember the idea was
>
>
> dismissed (I am not able to find the discussion between him and G Goldberg),
> but there were few who were receptive. I think the guy also made a scratch
> re
On Thursday 05 January 2012 13.25:53 Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
> In this way we can still query nepomuk database like if we write data there
> directly, but we will handle aggregation using a library whose only aim is
> to aggregate contacts.
FWIW, a dedicated library -- if feasible -- would
10 matches
Mail list logo