FOSDEM 2012 - CrossDesktop DevRoom Call for Talks

2011-11-17 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Hi, FOSDEM is one of the largest gatherings of Free Software contributors in the world and happens each February in Brussels (Belgium). One of the tracks will be the CrossDesktop DevRoom, which will host Desktop-related talks. We are now inviting proposals for talks about Free/Libre/Open-source S

Re: Review Request: Fix crash in KonqView

2011-11-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103176/#review8287 --- This review has been submitted with commit 71f64e29a072a0da13e1

Re: Review Request: Fix crash in KonqView

2011-11-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103176/#review8286 --- This review has been submitted with commit 96901c51997391b7f6bb

Re: Review Request: Fix crash in KonqView

2011-11-17 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 9:28 p.m., Ruurd Pels wrote: > > konqueror/src/konqview.h, line 280 > > > > > > OK I can agree with returning an empty list if m_service == null > > however I also think we need to come up with

Re: Review Request: Prevent KConfigGroup::revertToDefault from marking the kconfig as dirty if there's nothing to do

2011-11-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103168/#review8284 --- the function definitely seems to be a misnomer; according to you

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Alexey Chernov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/ --- (Updated Nov. 17, 2011, 6:18 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs. Descripti

Re: Review Request: Fix crash in KonqView

2011-11-17 Thread Ruurd Pels
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103176/#review8281 --- Ship it! OK ship it although it might mask off deeper troubles.

Re: Frameworks mailing list

2011-11-17 Thread Steven Sroka
>2011/11/17 Andras Mantia : > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that >> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their >> > point :( >> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion

Re: Frameworks mailing list

2011-11-17 Thread Andras Mantia
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that > > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their > > point :( > I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion. > > If the signal to noise rati

Review Request: Fix crash in KonqView

2011-11-17 Thread Dawit Alemayehu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103176/ --- Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure. Description --- Tho

Re: Review Request: make KFileWidget keep current extension if possible

2011-11-17 Thread Martin Koller
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102986/ --- (Updated Nov. 17, 2011, 6:53 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs. Changes -

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/#review8276 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7e7cae743af072a7afd0

Re: Frameworks mailing list

2011-11-17 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 17 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this > > > list, there is a frameworks mailing

Re: Review Request: GSoC: Errors handling during file transfer.

2011-11-17 Thread Cyril Oblikov
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 2:33 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > > > David Faure wrote: > Cyril, can you rebase your changes on top of the kdelibs frameworks > branch, compile, and commit there? Hi David. I'm currently working on this dialog together with Björn Balazs. Now we a mostly concentrated

Re: Review Request: KConfigXT performance fix: no need to reparse when nothing to save

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103166/ --- (Updated Nov. 17, 2011, 3:41 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs and Aaron J.

Re: Review Request: Prevent KConfigGroup::revertToDefault from marking the kconfig as dirty if there's nothing to do

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103168/ --- (Updated Nov. 17, 2011, 3:41 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs, Thomas Brax

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8272 --- This review has been submitted with commit e91e5fed6b1aad365e12

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8271 --- Ship it! Ah, no, you're right, I read 'man operator' wrong. + d

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread Jaime Torres Amate
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/ --- (Updated Nov. 17, 2011, 2:37 p.m.) Review request for kdelibs. Changes -

Re: Review Request: GSoC: Errors handling during file transfer.

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 2:33 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Cyril, can you rebase your changes on top of the kdelibs frameworks branch, compile, and commit there? - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http:/

Re: Review Request: GSoC: Errors handling during file transfer.

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102388/#review8269 --- - David Faure On Aug. 24, 2011, 4:29 p.m., Cyril Oblikov wrote

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 17 November 2011 13:33:25 David Faure wrote: > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8264 > --- >

Re: Review Request: Provide extra options for date keyword display in KDateComboBox

2011-11-17 Thread Allen Winter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103103/#review8267 --- >From a pure perspective of the code it is a +1 from me. I would

Re: Review Request: Provide extra options for date keyword display in KDateComboBox

2011-11-17 Thread David Jarvie
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103103/#review8265 --- Any comments on this? - it would be good to get it into 4.8. It

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8264 --- kutils/kpluginselector.cpp

Re: This starts to become a dangerous path (Was: New Feature for kdelibs)

2011-11-17 Thread Kevin Kofler
I think this thread is indeed quite a dead end, but since you mentioned my feature: Thomas Zander wrote: > And I'm still not seeing anyone put in the in comparison tiny fraction of > time of porting the auto-download plasma thing to frameworks. Let me clear up a few things: * The problem isn't

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread Jaime Torres Amate
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 12:59 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > Looks good except for one item. which item? - Jaime Torres --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8262 --

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread 4ernov
2011/11/17 Christoph Feck >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/ > > On November 17th, 2011, 9:20 a.m., *Aaron J. Seigo* wrote: > > looks very nice and thorough. > > as for branch: it's a bug fix for sure and should go into the

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread 4ernov
2011/11/17 Rolf Eike Beer > > > Several small fixes to allow RenameDialog form and its widgets resize > > itself according to extra information gathered for source and destination > > items. > > > > Without these fixes RenameDialog in common case appears as shown on > > screenshot 1 (without previ

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Alexey Chernov
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 9:20 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > looks very nice and thorough. > > > > as for branch: it's a bug fix for sure and should go into the KDE/4.7 > > branch. that gets merged into master on a semi-regular basis, so don't > > worry about master (it'll happen for you). it will

Re: Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/#review8262 --- Looks good except for one item. - David Faure On Nov. 17, 201

Re: This starts to become a dangerous path (Was: New Feature for kdelibs)

2011-11-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
On 11/17/2011 04:05 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Thursday 17 November 2011 00.14.23 Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> the best way to "deal with it" is not to consider it a fork of kdelibs >>> but the next version of kdelibs (that's what it is) and help out with >>> it > >> I'd be interested if I could

Review Request: trivial fixes for some warnings of clang++ (2.99.9999)

2011-11-17 Thread Jaime Torres Amate
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103165/ --- Review request for kdelibs. Description --- Trivial c++ fixes for som

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Christoph Feck
> On Nov. 17, 2011, 9:20 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > looks very nice and thorough. > > > > as for branch: it's a bug fix for sure and should go into the KDE/4.7 > > branch. that gets merged into master on a semi-regular basis, so don't > > worry about master (it'll happen for you). it will

Re: This starts to become a dangerous path (Was: New Feature for kdelibs)

2011-11-17 Thread David Faure
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 19:07:51 Jaime wrote: > Hello, > Probably I've missed something, or what I propose is unpractical (or too > late), but here I go, anyway: > > If the frameworks branch still depends on Qt 4, > Is it possible to have a "public" version of it once the > refactoring has b

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103160/#review8254 --- Ship it! looks very nice and thorough. as for branch: it's a b

Re: Frameworks mailing list

2011-11-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 09:48:15 Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > In case someone is interested since it has never mentioned in this list, > > there is a frameworks mailing list at kde-frameworks-devel > > https://mail.kde.org/mailm

Re: This starts to become a dangerous path (Was: New Feature for kdelibs)

2011-11-17 Thread Thomas Zander
On Thursday 17 November 2011 00.14.23 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > the best way to "deal with it" is not to consider it a fork of kdelibs > > but the next version of kdelibs (that's what it is) and help out with > > it > I'd be interested if I could, but learning C++ didn't make it to the topof > t

Re: Review Request: Pretty resize of RenameDialog according to its content

2011-11-17 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
> Several small fixes to allow RenameDialog form and its widgets resize > itself according to extra information gathered for source and destination > items. > > Without these fixes RenameDialog in common case appears as shown on > screenshot 1 (without preview for files) and 2 (without preview for