Valentin Rusu wrote:
> As you may already know, the ksecretsservice API merging to the
> kdelibs/4.7 branch was no longer an acceptable solution because of
> recent frameworks related decisions. It was suggested to put it into
> it's separate repository, alongside with the
> kde-runtime/ksecretsser
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103109/#review8131
---
This review has been submitted with commit
4acac3ad3fa7c3c212c4
Hello,
As you may already know, the ksecretsservice API merging to the
kdelibs/4.7 branch was no longer an acceptable solution because of
recent frameworks related decisions. It was suggested to put it into
it's separate repository, alongside with the
kde-runtime/ksecretsserviced I also merge
On 11/11/2011 03:24 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
Yes, I'll take that suggestion. But is the frameworks branch working
right now?
Is it possible to use it as the main desktop session on my computer, on
a day-to-day basis?
The frameworks branch is not meant to be used in the short term
(it may work,
On Friday, November 11, 2011 16:50:00 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > note that the decisions which i am simply repeating and asking people to
> > respect were made this past summer in a meeting of some 30 libs
> > contributors and then brought here
On Friday 11 November 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi Kevin,
>
> first, let's back off from the unecessary rhetoric. for instance, i don't
> think calling people hypocrites is going to get anyone anywhere other than
> annoyed, upset and divided. i hope we can agree on that.
>
> On Friday, Novemb
Good morning
In the weeks after the 20th of November there will be an IRC meeting about the
state, progress and further plans and schedule for the modularization of
kdelibs and KDE frameworks 5.
If you're interested please add yourself to the Doodle at:
http://www.doodle.com/tbndqqynre36ax9f
On Friday 11 November 2011 12:05:40 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> [...]
> However, I also have my part of responsibility in not being more close
> to the frameworks work. But please understand I'm working fulltime
> elsewhere and I try to keep my involvement to a controlled level in
> order not to disturb
On 11/11/2011 09:52 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2011 00:26:23 Valentin Rusu wrote:
Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
the main repositories as follows:
evidently there was a failure somewhere, and i'll take responsibility for it
because p
On 11/11/2011 03:06 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday, 11 de November de 2011 00.26.23, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
the main repositories as follows:
*kdelibs/kdeui/ksecretsservice*
API intented for the applications. Will
On Friday, November 11, 2011 00:26:23 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
> the main repositories as follows:
evidently there was a failure somewhere, and i'll take responsibility for it
because probably i should have noticed this was going
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103109/#review8124
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andreas Schneider
On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:3
> On Nov. 10, 2011, 10:02 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I would like to see this in kdelibs 4.8. It is a rather minor change and
> > should be fine for 4.7 as well. But I don't know what's the state for
> > additions to kdelibs currently...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> The freeze is today
hi Kevin,
first, let's back off from the unecessary rhetoric. for instance, i don't
think calling people hypocrites is going to get anyone anywhere other than
annoyed, upset and divided. i hope we can agree on that.
On Friday, November 11, 2011 04:58:09 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You cannot really F
14 matches
Mail list logo
