On Monday 24 October 2011, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes, most probably.
> >
> >
> > I guess it was first developed as a standalone tool, where you have to do
> > everything yourself, including searching for Qt4 etc., and then was added
> > into kdebase.
>
> Checking the other cmake files of
Hi,
> Yes, most probably.
>
>
> I guess it was first developed as a standalone tool, where you have to do
> everything yourself, including searching for Qt4 etc., and then was added
> into kdebase.
Checking the other cmake files of libkephal, it does not seem to support
standalone builds anymor
> On Oct. 23, 2011, 4:22 p.m., Ralf Jung wrote:
> > Any news? Can I ship this (simplified) version of the original request?
>
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> in qt review terms, you get a +1 from me. this code is pretty much
> unmaintained, so it's unlikely that you'll get more feedback than
