On Saturday, October 01, 2011 23:02:40 Dario Freddi wrote:
> In addition, you have a separate section where you can override some
> settings based on which activity you are in. It's exactly like it is now,
> except you can not MANUALLY change the profile (e.g. by using the applet)
This is really t
On Saturday 01 October 2011 23:41:42 Anders Lund wrote:
> On Lørdag den 1. oktober 2011, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I don't understand how creating a new activity represents an improvement
> > to the user. If I understand the proposal correctly the user will only
> > use the power manager to chan
On Saturday 01 October 2011 23:33:22 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, October 01, 2011 11:21:46 PM Dario Freddi wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 October 2011 23:09:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > I don't understand how creating a new activity represents an
> > > improvement to the user. If I unders
On Lørdag den 1. oktober 2011, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't understand how creating a new activity represents an improvement
> to the user. If I understand the proposal correctly the user will only
> use the power manager to change existing profiles and if they want to
> create an alternative
On Lørdag den 1. oktober 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
>
> Me and Bjorn have been discussing extensively about how to improve the
> current situation with Power Management in KDE. We focused on simplicity,
> still without losing power-user features. And we hav
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 11:21:46 PM Dario Freddi wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 23:09:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I don't understand how creating a new activity represents an improvement
> > to the user. If I understand the proposal correctly the user will only
> > use the power man
On Saturday 01 October 2011 23:09:27 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't understand how creating a new activity represents an improvement
> to the user. If I understand the proposal correctly the user will only
> use the power manager to change existing profiles and if they want to
> create an alter
On Saturday 01 October 2011 21:30:02 Lukas wrote:
> On 1 October 2011 21:36, wrote:
> > > Something like having Power mode switch:
> > >
> > > [Performance] [Normal] [Battery stretch]
> > >
> > > where Normal is current static profile; Performance - temporary
> > > disables any limitations; Batt
On Saturday 01 October 2011 21:21:40 Andras Mantia wrote:
> [Please reply on both lists if you cross-posted, otherwise dicussion will
> be more fragmented. I just looked up the plasma list out of curiosity,
> normally I don't follow, so your mail would have been missed.]
>
> Dario Freddi wrote:
>
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 09:54:52 PM Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 21.02.19 Dario Freddi wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Also please do not remove the possibility to change how a certain state
> > > should look like. So far I've always changed the "on battery" profile.
> >
> > I
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 08:38:09 PM Dario Freddi wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 20:07:12 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > > I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to
> > > use them. So this sounds more like t
On Saturday 01 October 2011 21:03:10 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> What happens if I don't use activities at all since they provide no use
> for me? And whats also not clear to me: How can I get powermanagement
> configured so it never dims down my screen brightness (since thats
> making the display use
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 08:27:02 AM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 00:12:05 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 10:07:27 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > will say "Platform 4.7, Plasma
> > >
> > > Workspaces 4.8 and application updates" (or som
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102753/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime.
Description
---
With this patch, nepo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102751/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Description
---
Hi, this patch sets a min
On Saturday 01 October 2011 21.02.19 Dario Freddi wrote:
[...]
> > Also please do not remove the possibility to change how a certain state
> > should look like. So far I've always changed the "on battery" profile.
>
> I think there is a certain misunderstanding here. I have said the
> possibility
[Please reply on both lists if you cross-posted, otherwise dicussion will be
more fragmented. I just looked up the plasma list out of curiosity, normally
I don't follow, so your mail would have been missed.]
Dario Freddi wrote:
>> I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the nee
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101653/
---
(Updated Oct. 1, 2011, 7:14 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary (u
On 01.10.11 16:27:48, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
>
> Me and Bjorn have been discussing extensively about how to improve the
> current
> situation with Power Management in KDE. We focused on simplicity, still
> without losing power-user features. And we have a
On Saturday 01 October 2011 20:50:30 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 20.33.06 Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 01, 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > I can't comment on activities, never used t
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 14:43:24 Michael Pyne wrote:
> I can say that on my laptop I've used the power management widget all
> the� time, but the only times I've touched Activities has been
> completely by accident, since I use the laptop for basically one
> thing. So while Activities should
On Saturday 01 October 2011 20.33.06 Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Saturday, October 01, 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
> >
> > [...]
>
> I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to use
> them. So this sounds more like the power
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hopefully, this solution will please everyone and will make activities even
> more useful. Do you like it? More suggestions? Speak now or shut up forever!
I actually think I like the idea of allowing what Activity you're using at the
ti
On Saturday 01 October 2011 20:07:12 Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to use
> > them. So this sounds more like the power management applet would force
> > me to create and use activi
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Andras Mantia wrote:
> I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to use
> them. So this sounds more like the power management applet would force
> me to create and use activites.
+1. Actually I'm confused by the concept of activities as a wh
On Saturday 01 October 2011 16.27.48 Dario Freddi wrote:
> Suppose you want to have an activity named "Sleep", in which you watch a
> movie, and the PC will shutdown after 90 mins of inactivity. In this case,
> you would just specify to override the "Suspend Session" action. Or, you
> want to hav
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
> [...]
I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to use
them. So this sounds more like the power management applet would force
me to create and use activites.
What I ca
On Saturday 01 October 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > this i guess would be a kind of "presentation mode"...
> > would it still cover enough use cases?
> > maybe together with activities could be enough, not 100% sure
>
> Well, covering all use cases is something I don't feel I can guarantee for
>
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:55:54 Marco Martin wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 October 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
>> > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
>> > At the same time, the combobox for selecting a profile in the battery
>> > applet wil
On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:55:54 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
> > At the same time, the combobox for selecting a profile in the battery
> > applet will be removed. It will, although, be replaced by a toggle bu
On Saturday 01 October 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
> At the same time, the combobox for selecting a profile in the battery
> applet will be removed. It will, although, be replaced by a toggle button
> for inhibition: by enabling/disabling it, power management
On Saturday 01 October 2011, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
>
> Me and Bjorn have been discussing extensively about how to improve the
> current situation with Power Management in KDE. We focused on simplicity,
> still without losing power-user features. And we have
Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting.
Me and Bjorn have been discussing extensively about how to improve the current
situation with Power Management in KDE. We focused on simplicity, still
without losing power-user features. And we have a plan I'd like to share and
get some feedback on.
The
On Saturday, 1 de October de 2011 12:58:01 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (And I know that Qt is also breaking the ABI. That's something I also can't
> agree with, especially considering that Qt 4 was advertised as "the big ABI
> break which will make new ABI breaks unnecessary for a very long time" and
>
PPS:
I wrote:
> However, working with you is only possible if you are also interested in
> working with us, which implies listening to our needs, concerns and
> wishes. By closing down the branch where our current development is
> necessarily focused on since that's what we will be shipping in the
PS:
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> the choice that packagers have is to actually work with us instead of
> against us.
We would very much love to work with you. In fact, this is why I submitted
my patches to KDE ReviewBoard before even getting them into Rawhide. I
really WANT these to be upstream. Fed
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> so some features will indeed have to wait .. and that's not a horrible
> thing because it means that frameworks will get more developer attention
> and the attention it is getting already will not be slowed even further by
> having to deal with bringing over features from 4.
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> One of the main reasons for the rebranding was to realize that "KDE" is
> not one product, but a community that produces multiple products among
> them a desktop environment (Plasma). What you just try to tell us is that
> the complete rebranding is nonsense and we should go
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Have you actually tried to get the fedora patches into the 3.5 branch? I
> cannot remember any discussion about it on kcd...
>
> Even if upstream would say no to the feautures what is wrong with doing a
> distro-3.5 branch so that at least all distros can have the same patc
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> the features that got into the 4.7 branch to date have been things that
> were already worked on before the Frameworks decision was made. it's was
> an odd cas were features had been worked on while 4.7 was frozen with the
> expectation of a 4.8 ... and that left us with the
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> forgot to add kcd
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Re: "gamer" mouse button shortcuts (LONG)
> Date: Saturday 01 October 2011, 08:19:47
> From: Martin Gräßlin
> To: Kwin, NET API, kwin styles API, kwin modules API
>
41 matches
Mail list logo