2011/8/29 Albert Astals Cid :
> What's special in those classes?
Well, nothing, nevermind ;)
They are just much simpler than the *Job classes.
--
Alexander Potashev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102450/#review6114
---
Thanks, but you need please to rebase your diff against master f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102450/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2011, 11:33 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and P
> On Aug. 28, 2011, 12:49 p.m., Peter Penz wrote:
> > Looks fine! Please just push it to master after fixing the minor
> > const-comments.
Pushed to master. I forgot to mention the review number in the commit message.
- Tirtha
---
This
A Divendres, 26 d'agost de 2011, Alexander Potashev vàreu escriure:
> 2011/8/26 David Faure :
> > A last argument, code is easier to maintain if it follows the same rules
> > everywhere. So in all "public library" code (Qt, kdelibs, and all other
> > public libs) we should do things the same way, t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102465/
---
(Updated Aug. 28, 2011, 12:21 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and P
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102479/
---
Review request for KDE Runtime and Darío Andrés Rodríguez.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102475/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
The apidox for KAssitantDialo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102465/#review6096
---
Ship it!
Looks fine! Please just push it to master after fixing
> [: Stephen Kelly :]
> Also, if you make a change which is likely not to apply cleanly to
> frameworks, it's probably best for you to merge it sooner rather than wait
> for someone else to do it wrongly.
Good point, I might have missed that. So, I'll always check if 4.7 change
applies cleanly, an
Chusslove Illich wrote:
>> [: Stephen Kelly :]
>> We don't have to make one commit on 4.7 == one merge into frameworks.
>>
>> We can just delay the merge and do it once a day or week. No one is using
>> frameworks, so we just need to make sure the commits get in eventually or
>> before it becomes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102465/#review6086
---
Looks very good from my point of view. The new files
kitemlistk
> [: Stephen Kelly :]
> We don't have to make one commit on 4.7 == one merge into frameworks.
>
> We can just delay the merge and do it once a day or week. No one is using
> frameworks, so we just need to make sure the commits get in eventually or
> before it becomes hard to merge.
Who exactly is
13 matches
Mail list logo