As you know already, here is the data field scheme:
There are two "available" bits within the current enum and flags. (Total
width 16 bits; 15 usable without creating a risk of interpretation as a
"sign" bit under certain compilers.) The first of these bits (x2000) is
used for raw Button #10,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101575/#review5719
---
Any progress?
- Torgny
On June 10, 2011, 9:18 p.m., John Layt
On Friday 12 August 2011, Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Times are interesting right now!
> - Qt is focusing heavily on Qt5.
> - KDE is focusing on KDE 5 (plasma 2 and making modules mainly)
> - QML is the new big thing!
>
> Now for application developers like me, and probably everyone reading
> this list
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102328/#review5722
---
Ship it!
Thanks for the update, looks good! I've pushed your pa
A Dilluns, 15 d'agost de 2011, Alexander Potashev vàreu escriure:
> 2011/8/15 Albert Astals Cid :
> > You do not use d pointers in any of your classes thus maintaining Binary
> > Compatibility is going to be almost impossible if you need to expand
> > them.
> How about adding a "QMap m_ext;" to *In
If anyone is interested in my proposal for DE-specific keys, I've
written a proposal for how the Desktop Entry Specification could be
updated. This support could be used to implement the naming mentioned,
that is calling it "System Settings" in KDE, and "KDE System Settings"
elsewhere - without new
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 13:47 +0200, todd rme wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 4 August 2011 07:27, George Spelvin wrote:
> >> I think what is needed is a series of more specific alternate names in
> >> a .desktop file, with more levels than the current Generic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102328/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2011, 1:16 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Pe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102328/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Peter Penz.
Summary
---
This pat
2011/8/15 Albert Astals Cid :
> You do not use d pointers in any of your classes thus maintaining Binary
> Compatibility is going to be almost impossible if you need to expand them.
How about adding a "QMap m_ext;" to *Info classes,
so that I can store additional variables there? Most (but not all
Am Samstag, 13. August 2011 17:18:22 schrieb Marc Deop Argemí:
> On Friday 12 August 2011 15:02:48 Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > We have not gotten any suggestions for people to receive the phone.
> > So if you had written a simple: I want it, you would have been the one.
>
> Well, i do want one, spec
On Sunday 14 August 2011 23.05.41 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> #2 Your patch has several issues i mentioned there
I noticed those too, and I wanted to just say that I'd trust David and Thiago
on these concepts any day. Maybe we can just use the structure they suggested
(and Albert coded) and move
12 matches
Mail list logo
