>On 5 August 2011 23:37, Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2011 23:35:10 Steven Sroka wrote:
>> >On 5 August 2011 16:39, Shaun Reich
> wrote:
>> >> I can see where they are stored in an QList and where they are
>> >> placed into the menu, but not where the values in the QList get
>> >>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Mark wrote:
> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
> http://ppenz.blogspot.com/2011/08/introducing-dolphin-20.html
Just because Dolphin is being rewritten using itemviews-ng and
QGraphics* doesn't mean that it's heading towards the QML
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Mark wrote:
> 1. Write the application in Qt mostly and use kdelibs where needed?
> 2. Same as 1. but make the GUI in QML like i did in the example above?
> 3. Skip C++ altogether and make in in QML only?
> .. more options?
>
> I personally like option 2 the best
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Majewsky
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mark wrote:
>>> Dolphin is going in the QML direction?
>>> Yes, I think a Juk rewritten in QML could be a good thing.
>>
>> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
>> http://ppenz.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Mark wrote:
> Ah oke. Just some idea i have now.. Right now someone is working on a
> Phonon QML thing.
SOMEONE? like seriously? :P
I guess I need to work on my public image a bit :P
Hi,
Times are interesting right now!
- Qt is focusing heavily on Qt5.
- KDE is focusing on KDE 5 (plasma 2 and making modules mainly)
- QML is the new big thing!
Now for application developers like me, and probably everyone reading
this list, some uncertainty is popping up. At least for me. This
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Mark wrote:
>> Dolphin is going in the QML direction?
>> Yes, I think a Juk rewritten in QML could be a good thing.
>
> Well, in that direction.. it's not written in QML or anything.. :
> http://ppenz.blogspot.com/2011/08/introducing-dolphin-20.html
Of course it d
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mark wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
>>> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
>> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
>> where it's not lightweigth, for the code there nee
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
> where it's not lightweigth, for the code there needs much love. that
> said, juk is part of KDE softwa
I want it! I'll implement kwallet and new ksecretsservice tools on it!
:-)
Valentin Rusu (valir)
KSecretsService (KWallet replacement)
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Anyone that deserves or wants a free N900 from the KDE or KDE PIM community?
Am Montag, 18. Juli 2011 11:45:14 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
>
juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
where it's not lightweigth, for the code there needs much love. that
said, juk is part of KDE software, while Amarok does not follow the
KDE rules to be part of the
Anyone that deserves or wants a free N900 from the KDE or KDE PIM community?
Am Montag, 18. Juli 2011 11:45:14 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> Kontact Touch - an application build on top of KDE Platform 4 - has won
> the second place in the contest of porting applications to MeeGo!
> The reward for be
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne wrote:
>> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
>>
>> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
>>
>> I don't agree th
Hi;
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:45:41 +0200, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Martin Gräßlin
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Sunday 31 July 2011 12:58:05 Michael Jansen wrote:
>>> > Did we manage to break kde under virt
15 matches
Mail list logo
