On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> A draft list was made of some areas for focus with names drafted in against
>> them:
>> ...
>> * KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
>
> Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
> against 5.0 ? I have made some simple
On Monday 18 July 2011 22:43:20 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently comparing our FindX11.cmake with the one in current cmake.
> Our copy is in kdelibs/cmake/modules/, CMake's is in its Module/ directory.
>
> There are some things our version checks for, which the one from cmake
>
Hi,
> A draft list was made of some areas for focus with names drafted in against
> them:
> ...
> * KJob - Qt-Addon for 5.1
Is the lack of manpower the reason or something else it is not planned
against 5.0 ? I have made some simple modifications in our project
where it is now KDE dependency free
On 28 July 2011 08:51, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> I thought that was what the GenericName entry was supposed to be good
> for, so gnome-terminal.desktop would have
>
> Name=GNOME Terminal
> GenericName=Terminal
> Exec=gnome-terminal
>
> and the runner/menu could use the GenericName unless there's a
>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:11:32AM +0200, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark wrote:
> > Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
> > an IRC chat room and talk about it.
>
> That is pretty much exactly what I'm trying to organize. But I need
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102095/#review5179
---
This review has been submitted with commit
a456e8600b63300d520b
Am Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:15:46 +0200
schrieb Olav Vitters :
> However, that is not our goal. We want something simple. For
> everything part of GNOME Core we have say what it does instead of
> putting the git module name in the menu.
I thought that was what the GenericName entry was supposed to be
> On July 28, 2011, 10:26 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > I don't think it is good for unit-tests to test different things depending
> > on environment variables (
> > @David, what is your opinion on the subject?)
> >
> > I was actually about to commit a simpler fix:
> >
> > @@ -26,11 +26,11
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:24, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:11:32AM +0200, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark wrote:
>> > Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
>> > an IRC chat room and talk about it.
>>
>> That is pr
> void KGlobalSettingsTest::initTestCase()
> {
> +// Some signals are only emitted when we are running a full KDE
> session. If
> +// we are not then KDE applications follow the platform palette and
> font
> +// settings.
> +setenv("KDE_FULL_SESSION", "1", 1);
> +
qputenv()?
Eik
> On July 28, 2011, 10:26 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > I don't think it is good for unit-tests to test different things depending
> > on environment variables (
> > @David, what is your opinion on the subject?)
> >
> > I was actually about to commit a simpler fix:
> >
> > @@ -26,11 +26,11
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102098/#review5166
---
I don't think it is good for unit-tests to test different things
My plans for BDS include:
· Drink Northen German beer
· Pay some beers to some KDE hackers and active community
· Improve the communication between "platform" developers and us
NetworkManager
BlueZ
UPower
UDisk
UNextThink
etc...
· Draft a plan for
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 09:35:57 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> Hi all
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:59, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:40:11 +0200, "Aaron J. Seigo"
wrote:
> (and others wrote as well)...
> Interestingly these plans all sound great for Akademy, but since it isa
On 07/27/2011 03:40 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi :)
BDS is coming up rather quickly and i've been doing some personal planning for
it today. i realized in one of those "i just realized the obvious, doh!"
moments that i have very little idea of what others are planning and hoping
for the event. i
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 00:54:50 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > One of my goals is to take steps to make the release team more scalable,
> > and reduce its bus numbers.
>
> Surely you mean increase :) A bus number of 1 means the team has a single
> point of failure.
Ah,
> On July 2, 2011, 9:49 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > hmm. but now things are still done twice in a kde session, no?
> > what was wrong with the suggestion to notify qt that it should update
> > "stuff"?
>
> Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> createApplicationPalette() is indeed called twice wh
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark wrote:
> Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
> an IRC chat room and talk about it.
That is pretty much exactly what I'm trying to organize. But I need to
know who that would be from the GNOME-side.
> note: congrats on the KDE
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, July 25, 2011 10:30:46 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>> This whole debate is way too heated and I'd like to take this out ofthe
>> arena. Are there 2 or 3 people on the GNOME side that areavailable to talk
>> this through and find a solu
Hi all
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:59, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:40:11 +0200, "Aaron J. Seigo" wrote:
(and others wrote as well)
...
Interestingly these plans all sound great for Akademy, but since it is
a Desktop Summit I would love to hear what cross-desktop plans there
ar
20 matches
Mail list logo
