Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> - Figure out how to solve the scripty problem. scripty does its own
> conflicting commits to .desktop files in both branches, and that won't
> change[1]. We probably need a custom merge tool for .desktop-like files
> that ignores translations.
I *think* I managed to write
> Most distributions split KDE packages so if you get a pre-installed
> computer with Gnome and a few KDE applications installed, KDE System
> Settings would not be installed.
>
>You are only likely to get both System Settings pre-installed if your
>computer was shipped with both KDE and Gnome desk
Le 23/07/2011 12:33, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Matthias Clasen a écrit:
>>
>>> I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the issue, really.
>>
>> Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
>> falls short?
>
> it falls short
Hi,
can anyone answer the case https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277319 , please
?
--
Best regards/Schöne Grüße
Martin
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against pro
A Dimecres, 13 de juliol de 2011, Gilles Caulier vàreu escriure:
> 2011/7/12 İsmail Dönmez
>
> > Hi;
> >
> > 2011/7/12 Alexander Neundorf
> >
> >> On Tuesday 12 July 2011, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >> > 2011/7/12 Alex Merry
> >> >
> >> > > On 12/07/11 08:06, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >> > >> It's f
On Saturday, July 23, 2011 04:41:05 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find what is proposed by Shaun to be acceptable, as the distinction
> between the two is clearly defined. It still allows users to determine
> the correct System Settings application to use to configure KDE
> applications with
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> @Matthias: please explain how this doesn't solve the issue.
It certainly solves the immediate symptom of 'two things in the menu
are named the same'.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi a écrit:
>
>> On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>>> Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
>>> falls short?
>>
>> it falls short in showing:
>>
>> System Settings
>> KDE System S
Emmanuele Bassi a écrit:
> On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
>> falls short?
>
> it falls short in showing:
>
> System Settings
> KDE System Settings
>
> under Gnome, and:
>
> System Settings
> Gnome System
On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Matthias Clasen a écrit:
>
> > I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the issue, really.
>
> Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
> falls short?
it falls short in showing:
System Settings
KDE System Settings
u
Denis Washington a écrit:
> Am 23.07.2011 11:54, schrieb Giovanni Campagna:
>> Il giorno sab, 23/07/2011 alle 11.27 +0200, Dodji Seketeli ha scritto:
>>> Matthias Clasen a écrit:
>>>
I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the issue, really.
>>>
>>> Why? Do you have an example that would s
Hi,
I find what is proposed by Shaun to be acceptable, as the distinction
between the two is clearly defined. It still allows users to determine
the correct System Settings application to use to configure KDE
applications with what is probably the most minimal level of
confusion.
KDE System Setti
On Saturday 23 July 2011 19:28:53 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> During the stable branch freeze before a minor version release (such as
> >> currently
before
> > the 4.7 release), it isn't possible to commit bug fixes to stable first and
> > then merge to
master.
> > Only master can be committed to,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 22 July 2011 17:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> To be more specific about the problem, installing kde-workspace to a
> GNOME installation results in 2 indistinguishable apps named System
> Settings and 2 named System Monitor. On Ubuntu at least
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 23 July 2011 01:42:16 David Jarvie wrote:
>> On Saturday 23 July 2011 00:00:16 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> > There is no active policy saying you're supposed to merge. Almost everybody
>> > in KDE is still doing cherry-picks. KDeve
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> What about, instead, Shaun's proposal? It seems reasonable to me
> (while I like to test it) and we could do the same in GNOME stuff
> (while it's additional work for maintainers and tranlators).
I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the
> This is what happens when you mix and match bits and pieces from
> different operating systems. There is really not much that can be done
> about it. Since that is what both KDE and GNOME are trying to do:
> build complete, self-contained systems.
So far we are running the same OS (for most of us
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:17:17AM +1200, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > Now lets go into something more productive and perhaps we can fix this
> > before the sunny Desktop Summit.
>
> Hi Olav,
>
> In terms of being productive surrounding this, I have several questions:
>
> Screenshots on your live
Hello,
Why not use Gnome System Settings and KDE System Settings instead?
So this can be visible in both environments, and the user will know what he
needs to change.
Internally I believe both can keep System Settings.
Using Gnome/KDE System Settings the user will know which one he want's to
use.
2011/7/23 Matthias Clasen :
>> I'd like to suggest that the GNOME developers consider changing the
>> public name of their app to "System Preferences." This matches the Mac
>> OS X design and arguably GNOME follows some parts of OS X design.
>> Furthermore, it is more in line with Gnome 2's System>
On 23/07/11 00:25, Shaun McCance wrote:
I very much doubt users will be any less confused when confronted
with "System Settings" and "System Preferences".
Especially as in other languages, there are not always two words for
this (e.g. German).
There's a very easy way to use a different appl
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 17:53 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On 22 July 2011 17:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >>
> >> Now lets go into something more productive and perhaps we can fix this
> >> before the sunny Desktop Summit.
> >
> > Hi Olav,
> >
> > In terms of being productive surrounding this, I have
On 22 July 2011 17:17, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>> Now lets go into something more productive and perhaps we can fix this
>> before the sunny Desktop Summit.
>
> Hi Olav,
>
> In terms of being productive surrounding this, I have several questions:
>
> Screenshots on your live wiki indicate that GNOM
23 matches
Mail list logo
