On Thursday, 2011-06-30, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Thursday, 30 de June de 2011, às 03:26:02, Christoph Feck escreveu:
> > We probably need kDebug(area) et al. features in Qt 5, too. For example,
> > I plan to make "kdelibs/kimgio" pure Qt, but when we switch to qDebug(),
> > we lose the ability
Em Thursday, 30 de June de 2011, às 03:26:02, Christoph Feck escreveu:
> We probably need kDebug(area) et al. features in Qt 5, too. For example, I
> plan to make "kdelibs/kimgio" pure Qt, but when we switch to qDebug(), we
> lose the ability to filter/redirect/suppress messages.
When you switch t
On Thursday 30 June 2011 01:43:44 John Layt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what
> technical changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
>
> One major point was the news that the Qt5 feature freeze is planned for
> September/October giving us only 2-3 months t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101804/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
Qt designer requires that sub
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101791/#review4268
---
This review has been submitted with commit
dd11f66a38a20c4fe942
Hi,
At QtCS we had a follow-up session from Platform 11 to discuss what technical
changes we'd like to see in Qt5.
One major point was the news that the Qt5 feature freeze is planned for
September/October giving us only 2-3 months to get the changes we need in.
This means we have to prioritis
On Monday 23 May 2011, Christoph Feck wrote:
> > On May 23, 2011, 9:33 a.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > > It is not called "RantingWidget", please correct it. Otherwise,
> > > good catch.
>
> Hm, why didn't I get John's mail ...
Because all Review Requests going to kde-core-devel (or any other KDE
Hi,
This is the third email in the series of three looking at KLocale in
Frameworks 5. This email covers Translation. This is a repost of a mail to
the Qt5 list with added context for KDE.
This email is a summary of the session on Translation held at the Qt
Contributors summit. The session
Hi,
This is the second email in the series of three looking at KLocale in
Frameworks 5. This email covers Date/Time, so I have also cc'ed the PIM
mailing list for their input.
As with QLocale, the lack of features in QDateTime has forced KDE to create
our own solutions such as KDateTime, KLoc
Hi,
I want to propose a plan for KLocale in Frameworks 5 as a result of the
various discussions at Platform 11 and the Qt Contibutors Summit. I'll be
splitting the proposal up into 3 emails about Locale, Date/Time, and
Translation.
Please note that the Translation part is outside my area of e
On Wednesday 29 Jun 2011 14:56:27 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> I thought GNOME/GTK already rejected Common Print Dialog, therefore
> rendering it effectively dead. (Nothing "Common" if only KDE adopts it.)
Last I heard Gnome had expressed reservations about its appearance breaking
their HIG and so t
On Wednesday 29 June 2011 23:13:14 Simon Persson wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 16.10.55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > ---
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101515/#review3736
>
On Tuesday 07 June 2011 16.10.55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101515/#review3736
> ---
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101800/
---
(Updated June 29, 2011, 9:39 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101791/#review4262
---
Ship it!
Tested now on both my f14 and f15 boxes with kde-4.6.4
I thought GNOME/GTK already rejected Common Print Dialog, therefore rendering
it
effectively dead. (Nothing "Common" if only KDE adopts it.)
Am Mittwoch 29 Juni 2011, 11:19:44 schrieb John Layt:
> Hi,
>
> OpenPrinting (a Linux Foundation project) has been working for a number of
> years to impl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101800/#review4260
---
this is definitely an improvement for discoverability. i'm not s
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:19 AM, John Layt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenPrinting (a Linux Foundation project) has been working for a number of
> years to implement the Common Print Dialog [1], a shared print dialog design
> and implementation for all Linux desktops. They have now secured some
> governme
Hi,
OpenPrinting (a Linux Foundation project) has been working for a number of
years to implement the Common Print Dialog [1], a shared print dialog design
and implementation for all Linux desktops. They have now secured some
government funding to complete a Qt version of the dialog in co-oper
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101800/#review4247
---
you should attach before/after screenshots.
it's usually wise to
20 matches
Mail list logo
