A Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Sebastian Kügler va escriure:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 20:53:43 Dawit A wrote:
> > Do you have any plans for pushing this into git master/KDE 4.6 branch
> > ? Either your patch or mine needs to make it into KDE 4.7.
>
> I'd prefer Dawit's patch, since it will also wor
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Seriously, displaying unread emails ?
> From which user ?
All of them.
MSWIN interates through each user in the listview displaying unread
mails for each. (it's just a count of unread emails..obviously you
don't want other people sift
On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Harald Sitter wrote:
...
> Yet despite having complete control we did not manage to come up with a
> truly good workspace experience that starts at the DM (power management,
> good looks, I for one have yet to see a sane UI-wise integration of stuff
> like fingerprint auth,
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:43:44 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011 12:22:10 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > But right now: (Once again this is what I see from outside:)
> > -KDM developers have no plans
>
> This seems incorrect, given Shaun's work on Plasma - and after the
> discuss
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 06:11:27 PM Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 June 2011 17:46:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
> > > There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
> > > LightDM, so why don't they instead improve K
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:55:03 PM todd rme wrote:
> So in other words when LightDM is mature no one will work on it and we
> will be left with the same problem?
Maybe, though if it remains active and healthy then we may not.
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 17:46:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
> > There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
> > LightDM, so why don't they instead improve KDM? Why should they be
> > putting their effort into an immature proj
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
>> There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
>> LightDM, so why don't they instead improve KDM? Why should they be
>> putting their effort into an immature project
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 05:37:14 PM todd rme wrote:
> There are apparently people willing to implement KDE support in
> LightDM, so why don't they instead improve KDM? Why should they be
> putting their effort into an immature project instead of a mature one?
Because they're motivated to work
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 12:22:10 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> But right now: (Once again this is what I see from outside:)
> -KDM developers have no plans
This seems incorrect, given Shaun's work on Plasma - and after the discussion
in this thread
this should be known by now.
> -KDM maintainer has no
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 08:20:35 AM todd rme wrote:
>> There seems to be an implicit assumption here that if we are going to
>> go the cross-desktop route it would have to be LightDM that we pick.
>> But if KDM is already pluggable enough
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:20 AM, todd rme wrote:
> I gather from the discussion that most, if not all, the features that
> KDM still needs are also lacking in LightDM, while KDM has lots of
> features LightDM does not. So if we are talking about wasted
> resources,
>wouldn't it waste far fewer r
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:59 PM, David Edmundson
wrote:
>Does KDM still run the greeters as root?
No. It's been not doing that for about a year or so.
--
Shaun Reich,
KDE Software Developer (kde.org)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:00:00PM +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> 2 takes long to start
>
> I think lightdm solves (2), but does so by cutting features, features
> which we probably need (some asked for XDMCP as an example).
>
no, it solves it by not using qt+kdeui (and even less plasma).
if y
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 June 2011 14:55:58 Shaun Reich wrote:
>> How does lightDM even handle different authentication types? KDM has a
>> plugin system which handles different auth types (fingerprint,
>> winbindd, etc.).
>>
>> However, the fundamenta
Just to clarify something...
I'm not pushing lightDM into KDE in anyway, it is not my favorite DM or
anything like that, though I see it as a highly interesting project with a
healthy and active community and I do think that KDE should be leading the
Qtness of the project as well as be sure tha
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 08:20:35 AM todd rme wrote:
> There seems to be an implicit assumption here that if we are going to
> go the cross-desktop route it would have to be LightDM that we pick.
> But if KDM is already pluggable enough that you can easily rip out the
> GUI and write and entire
On Friday, June 03, 2011 20:53:43 Dawit A wrote:
> Do you have any plans for pushing this into git master/KDE 4.6 branch
> ? Either your patch or mine needs to make it into KDE 4.7.
I'd prefer Dawit's patch, since it will also work with the leaner mobile build
profile, and HTML thumbnail generati
Hi Alex,
On Monday, June 13, 2011 21:10:36 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Today something happened to me again, I turn on my laptop at the begining of
> a meeting and when I needed it the battery was over because the laptop
> didn't went to suspension (as I'm used).
>
> That makes me wonder what are the p
19 matches
Mail list logo
