On Sunday 22 May 2011 10:51:39 Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Am Sonntag 22 Mai 2011, 00:26:58 schrieb Dawit A:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 21.05.11 13:25:32, Dawit A wrote:
> > >> No that is a moc issue. The code is properly @ifdef'ed out in the
> > >> code, but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101409/#review3453
---
This review has been submitted with commit
6379152334a4857f8dde
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101409/
---
(Updated May 21, 2011, 11:03 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101410/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps, KDE Runtime and kdelibs.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101409/#review3438
---
Okay.
Could someone with commit rights apply this patch, please
Hi Nikhil,
Jeudi, le 12. mai 2011, à 01:38, Nikhil Marathe a écrit:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> > Hi Nikhil,
> >
> > you know that today, April 12th, is already Hard Feature Freeze?! Would
> > be really sad if your upnp-ms kio-slave misses the deadli
Am Sonntag 22 Mai 2011, 00:26:58 schrieb Dawit A:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 21.05.11 13:25:32, Dawit A wrote:
> >> No that is a moc issue. The code is properly @ifdef'ed out in the
> >> code, but the generated moc file does not seem to exclude it. That is
> >
